Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chamillitaryboi94


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Chamillitaryboi94
Final: (0/3/1); Ended 21:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I'm closing this early, as there is no chance of it passing (WP:SNOW). -- Majorly  ( Talk ) 21:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

– I am a Wikipedian devoted to eliminating vandalism and helping Wikipedia stay clean. I am always ready to assist as needed. Chamillitaryboi94 20:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:I accept the nomination.

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I anticipate mostly helping remove vandalism and block vandals, as well as protect pages. Of course, I will also participate in deleting articles, enforcing policies, and all of the admin duties


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: I am most pleased with my editing to Deck the Halls (Film). I made a joke edit to that page once, but realized that vandalism has no point. I then changed the plot info from 3-4 sentences to a few paragraphs by adding a lot of information sbout the movie to that page. I also added some info and corrected some errors in Night at the Museum.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: The only things that have caused me stress are the constant vandalism from anons. Those users are extremely hard to deal with, especially because most of the ignore warnings.


 * General comments

Discussion



Support

Oppose
 * 1) Strong Oppose. Well, I'd love to be able to support. However, you don't even have 100 edits. I suggest you read up on policy and RfA standards and try again once you have made some edits. -_ teh  tennis  man  21:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose and reccomend withdrawl. Come back in about 8 months and when your edit count is about 3,300, with most of those edits in the Main, Wikipedia, and Template or Image namespaces. You should try helping out at WP:SUSPSOCK, WP:XFD, fighting vandalism, and WP:FA. Iced Kola  21:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose sorry but I have to agree with the above comments. Your "dedication to vandal fighting" is commendable but stretches to 7 vandalism reverts. There isn't anywhere near the amount of evidence in your contribution history for anyone to fairly conclude that you're ready to become an admin yet. Remember the standard on Wikipedia is evidence not truth. We need to see a long enough record here that we can see that you are ready for all the complex things that an admin must deal with. I suggest withdrawing this AfD, continuing your excellent contributions to Wikipedia. Whne you've been here 3-4 months and have at least 2500 edits under your belt, ask for an editor review to see how close you are to being ready for another AfD. Good luck, Gwernol 21:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Neutral You have not been here nearly long enough for users to judge you, and your edit count is low. Please consider withdrawing this nomination and trying again in three months' time, or about 3000 edits. -- Majorly  ( Talk ) 21:02, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.