Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chooserr


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Chooserr
Final (0/6/1) ended 10:02 5 November 2005 (UTC)

– While I haven't done too many changes on the English wikipedia I've helped with many of the other wikis. I can translate some german, and similar languages if I think the article in question is worth while, and am currently trying to add pages such as bibliotheca or terms such as gibus (under Top hat). My best article - and indeed my first - is the Rosel George Brown, one which is now the standard for all web information about the author - do a google search. I would gladly patrol some of the recent changes and do any administrative duties that are necessary. Chooserr 06:14, 2 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: "I nominated my self so I'll accept :-)"

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose - don't want to surface editcountitis, but 113 edits is VERY little, if you've got more edits on other Wikis why not try there? Also, failure to answer questions. -- NS LE  ( Commu nicate! ) < Contribs > 00:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, Per NSLE, but let's not start a pile-up, okay?--Sean|Bla ck 01:27, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Indeed, let's avoid a pile-up. -- NS LE  ( Commu nicate! ) < Contribs > 01:34, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose, per NSLE, keep up the editing and try again in a few months. --Holderca1 01:37, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per NSLE. Privat  e   Butcher  02:45, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) STRONG Oppose user is simply way too green, as said above, if you have so much experience with other wiki's why not ask for adminship there? I strongly suggest you bow out now and renominate in 6 months.  ALKIVAR &trade;Radioactivity symbol.png 03:12, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose – email is not set. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  06:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Neutral - doesn't meet any of my criteria. Rob Church Talk 02:33, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Comments
 * Not meaning to make a pile-up, I'm sugguesting you become familiar with our policies and realize what it takes to become an administrator. I'd be more than happy to support--provided you keep up some good editing across the various namespaces--once you have reached at least 1,000 or so good edits, and have been here for a couple months. Good luck, and I hope to see you around, -User:Mys e kurity|Mysekurity ]] additions | e-mail]]06:46, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.