Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/ChrisO

ChrisO
ChrisO is a good contributor and should be a sysop if he wants. He has shown remarkable patience with difficult users. --Wik 00:06, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * (Not a vote) - User has been here since October 21 and has 940 edits. &rarr;Raul654 00:10, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Did a complete rewrite of Kosovo War that was really needed, and has handled himself well with those that brought it to that state. Dori | Talk 00:14, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Chris appears to have a good understanding of Wikipedia and would make a good sysop. Angela. 07:39, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Immense patience shown. Morwen 07:40, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. A really good contributor and works towards NPOV on controversial articles on central/east european topics. Secretlondon 07:51, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support 172 08:22, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support; nothing but net, as far I can see... Cimon Avaro on a pogostick 09:19, Feb 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * Tuf-Kat
 * Support. I've known Chris O since the early days of the Scientology Internet war.  He has treated this infamously controversial subject with honesty and lack of bias, and he has contributed enormously to those subjects here along with many others. --Modemac 20:44, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. I've seen nothing but good from Mr. O. --No-One Jones 21:29, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support, welcome aboard! Meelar 02:01, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. john 04:28, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. He's done a fine and much needed job on the Kosovo related articles, and seems sensible....G-Man 18:47, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Primarily because Wik trusts him. --Uncle Ed 19:18, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * (belated) support. Tannin 10:01, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC) (I should read this page more often)

Crikey - I wasn't expecting this at all! Thanks for the support, it's genuinely unexpected and I'm glad to have been able to make a contribution. So, ummm... do I get a gold star now or something? :-) -- ChrisO 23:45, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * No, in 5 more days if there's still a consensus some bureaucrate will make you an admin. --Uncle Ed 19:11, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Tally: 14 for, 0 against. (ends 00:06, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)


 * I can't make out whether Tuf-Kat's vote is for or against. Anyone care to make a guess? -- ChrisO 09:42, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming it was meant to be support. Angela. 02:33, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)