Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cicero Dog


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Cicero Dog
Final (0/3/0) ending 16:11, 22nd of May 2006 (UTC)
 * Closed as user has been issued an indef ban . Ian13/ talk 17:26, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

– I consider myself honest and trustworthy. I am willing to dedicate much time to wikipedia. Cicero Dog 16:11, 15 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support
 * yes he's a lovely gut who has been victamised ian13
 * Strike: this edit was made by User:Cicero Dog. --Pak21 13:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I would certainly OPPOSE here... Ian13/ talk 17:20, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose far far too soon, not nearly enough edits and a lack of wiki policy knowledge. Put some time in doing quality editing then try again. Death Eater Dan    [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|  ]] ( Muahaha ) 17:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose (strongly): edits like this, taken in response to my prodding of The 4 Drams are unacceptable for a normal user. What would happen if he were an admin? --Pak21 17:27, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose way too new, also, some very strange edits, such as Pak21's above, as well as . Did not accept his own nom, and his answer to question 3 is false. He is making inflammatory comments at Wikipedia_talk:Community_Justice. - Pureblade  | Θ 18:07, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose doesn't understand Wikipedia nor WP:CIVIL or WP:NPA Computerjoe 's talk 13:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments
 * I note that the user has just had two sockpuppets banned. Is there any way we can "speedy fail" this? --Pak21 19:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I would do anything and everything i possibly could to aid wikipedia. Any long of tiresome jobs that nobody wants to do ... I am your man.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: I am pleased with the aricle about scottish school debating. A topic many people are interested in but little had information on....until now.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have had a couple of "run ins" with other user but we have resolved them and are now friends.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.