Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cjc811


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Cjc811
Final (0/4/0); ended 16:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW - Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination
– I believe I am qualified. I am currently a Page Patroller, Stub Tagger, and I change Vandalism back to the original article. I have been with Wikipedia for 4 years. I look for vandalism and test edits. If it is a test edit I tag it for speedy Deletion. If it is vandalism I revert back to the previous version. I have been a volunteer firefighter for 3 years so I have experience with volunteering. In addition I am on Wikipedia Almost Every Day Trying to help out. Thanks in advance to everyone who takes the time to voice their opinion!Cjc811 (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I will focus on Vandalism control and blocking anonymous IP addresses that deface the site. I will also respond to protection requests.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I tag pages for deletion that are vandalism or test edits.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, i have been i good standing.

General comments

 * Links for Cjc811:
 * Edit summary usage for Cjc811 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Not now. Only 106 edits and a history of creating pages that don't meet guidelines: Evony wiki, Whitney-Hostetter Volunteer Fire Department which don't indicate a strong understanding of Wikipedia's 5 pillars. Additionally, recent issues with copyvio and near-zero use of edit summaries are disturbing. tedder (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 2) Sorry, but I don't believe you have enough experience yet. Take a look through the recent list of successful requests for adminship to get a better idea of the experience levels that are typically expected of admin candidates. 28bytes (talk) 16:41, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) I have to agree with Tedder. —DoRD (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose You are in good standing, receiving no blocks so far, but I see less than 250 edits, which I think, isn't enough. Also, since you plan to take part in vandalism patrol, I don't see any of this "Undid revision by" part in the edit summary. You can use the Special:RecentChanges page in the interaction tab of this site. This is where you get the chance to see if there are any poor edits by IPs and new users. Anyway, I hope the statement I made will help you get started with vandalism patrol and good luck with it. If you're good enough, you may receive Rollback rights. Minima  ©  ( talk ) 16:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.