Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CrnaGora


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

CrnaGora
Final (2/12/1) ended 23:36 16 January 2006 (UTC)

– I am a Montenegrin who loves reading articles and editing articles in Wikipedia. My edits are either related to the Balkans or TV shows in America. I am currently working on trying to edit other things. I upload images to match with my articles, even though I can't find many images. I will try to edit a lot more articles. If I become an administrator of Wikipedia, I will help Wikipedia as much as I can. I will not vandalize any article nor the Main Page. I will not block IP users and users of Wikipedia neither for the fun of it nor revenge on them. I will not delete pictures just because of how they look nor because of the user who uploaded them CrnaGora 00:00, 15 January 2005 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept my nomination to become an administrator.CrnaGora 00:07, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) I support CrnaGora all the way after I read his article at my friend's house. After reading his articles, I checked what he had on other sites and his information was accurate.EditMan9000 00:11, 15 January, 2006 (UTC)
 * This vote is user's only edit to Wikipedia to date. -- Francs2000 [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 00:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Support Open minded.--Masssiveego 06:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose - too few edits, too new, and the mistakes made in getting this request up speak volumes. -- Francs2000 [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 00:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. 117 edits, with basically no edit summaries. Did not even notice the text saying that new nominations go on top. In all, lack of experience. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 00:17, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Hi there, I hope you stick around and help write some good articles, but with only 117 edits you are not quite ready for the extra responsibilities that being an admin will bring you. Come back in, say, three months when you have added lots of useful words here and there. David | Talk 00:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose. Self-nom stuck this down at the bottom of the RfA page, and used the vote tally to put in todays date (eg. (1/14/06)). The 1-edit sockpuppet doesn't help either. Too few edits, with most of them within own user namespace, and the very few project edits. Almost no edit summary usage.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  00:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Opppose as per above. PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose per above. Also, this user has little understanding of IP law. &#126;MDD4696 04:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose. Not nearly enough experience. Suggest you withdraw and come back in around 3 months when you have spread your edits around the various areas of Wikipedia.-- Dakota ~  ε  04:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose. Barely any edit summaries, very low edit count, no experience in categories,temlates, images, barely any talk items either.   xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  04:21, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose. Self-nom plus suck-poppet? Also tooo little time and experience. Kusonaga 08:43, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose and suggest withdrawal of nomination as clearly premature. Jonathunder 16:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Respectfully Oppose I believe this is my first ever oppose. To be honest I would like to say "Support" because in the early days all users had admin access and it worked reasonably well. However, due to factors involving such a large project I feel that this guy needs more experience. Nevertheless I hope you stick around. --- Responses to Chazz's talk page. Signed by Chazz @ 17:42, 15 January 2006 (UTC)q
 * 12) Oppose, reminds me of my previous rfa :). Just needs more experience. I like your thoughts and views concerning the project. -ZeroTalk 20:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) Neutral Please use edit summaries at all times.--Alhutch 04:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Comments


 * Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 1% for minor edits. Based on the last 68 major and and 2 minor edits outside the Wikipedia, User, Image, and all Talk namespaces. Mathbot 00:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * See information about CrnaGora's edits with Interiot's edit count tool or Interiot's edit history tool.



Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A. Any, I don't really care what sysop chores I do or have to do.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A.I am pleased with all my articles and contributions because I use what I know and I use what sites are related to the article and combine the information.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. I have copied the text on Time Warner Cable's site and used it in an article. The article was then under lockdown. I dealt with it by creating a temporary article which didn't get me in trouble. Then I used the temporary article to create the main article. I know now that you shouldn't copy text from a site and use it in an article is very bad.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.