Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Czac


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Czac
Closed per WP:SNOW by  Melsaran  (talk)

(0/3/0); Ended 14:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

- Hello, I'm Czac and I am going to nominate myself for adminship. I have about 100 edits and although that may seem small I think I would make a good administrator. I am heavily involved in the community being a member of several WikiProjects. I have also been involved in AfD and have reverted some vandalism and warned the vandal. I think I would be a very good administrator. Czac 14:10, 2 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I will take part in reverting vandalism and banning vandals. It would be much easier to have a vandal banned if I were an administrator. I will also take part in AfD and delete articles if they do not meet the guidelines. I will also take part in speedy deletions of articles.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I believe my best contribution to Wikipedia is the article on actor Leon Russom. Although the article is not yet finished I believe that it will become a very good article one day. The article is well referenced and contains a lot of information.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, I haven't. If I do get involved with one in the future I will try to resolve it calmly. I however do not think that I will get into many disputes with other users.

General comments

 * See Czac's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Czac:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Czac before commenting.''

Discussion


Support
 * Moral Support please withdraw your nomination while I know its in good faith, you dont have anywhere near the experience to be successful at this time. Gnangarra 14:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC) moral support withdrawn, changing to oppose. Gnangarra 14:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not going to withdraw it.

Oppose
 * 1) I am sorry, but you are way too new for adminship right now, with no edits in project namespace apart from this RFA. I suggest that you withdraw, and reapply in a few months' time when you feel ready. Please don't feel disappointed!  Melsaran  (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose You're too un-experienced to be an administrator, try making more edits in a variety of spaces. Try again in a few months. - Lemonflash (do something)  14:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose lack of simple formatting knowledge, not signing comment diff in response to my moral support shows a complete lack of understanding of wikiquette Gnangarra 14:58, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

I usually sign my comments see Talk:Pray (2007 film). I just forgot that time.Czac 15:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.