Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dagoth Ur, Mad God


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Dagoth Ur, Mad God
Final: (0/4/0); Ended 04:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC) - closed per WP:SNOW. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 04:03, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

- I have been very good to wikiPedia, welcoming new users and being a Wiki Ogre. I have not been blocked on this Wiki once!! --Dagoth Ur, Mad God (talk) 03:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Deleting prodded pages.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: The fixing the double redirect: WP:SAND -> Toys -> Toy


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:No

General comments

 * See Dagoth Ur, Mad God's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Dagoth Ur, Mad God:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Dagoth Ur, Mad God before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) 93 edits, 49 of which are too your own userspace. Sorry, dude, but I don't see enough work/experience here to be able to say I trust you with the tools.-- Koji †  Dude  (C) 03:44, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong oppose, only been a registered user for two months, with only 28 main space edits (and then to only two articles). Over half his edits are to his own user page and what appears to be experimenting and playing around. Far too inexperienced to be an admin. Candidate has little understanding of Wikipedia editing guidelines and policies. From the candidate's recent hideous attempt to start a new bot that will "Will make a few edits to the Main Page" and "Will make some edits around Wikipedia", his playing around with making a self-named page in the Wikipedia mainspace, various bad redirects, and lack of any real edits beyond a very few to two articles which were vandal reversals, etc. this seems more like another of the candidate's testing and experimenting than a true RfA deserving consideration. Collectonian (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Sorry, but you need more experience. Majoreditor (talk) 03:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose and snow close. Patent joke nom. —  iride  scent  03:58, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.