Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/David Gerard

User:David Gerard
A solid contributor ~ 4000 edits since arriving in January. Always calm when the editing gets hot, he would make a good admin. theresa knott 10:11, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * I accept - David Gerard 10:49, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support


 * 1) theresa knott 10:11, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Excellent contributor, and brings a lot of experience from usenet in dealing with controversial issues. - MykReeve 10:41, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 10:49, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Support, David's a man you can rely on to do a good job as an admin. &mdash;Stormie 10:51, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Support. &mdash;Morven 11:01, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. JFW |  T@lk  11:09, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Dysprosia 11:46, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. --"D ICK " C HENEY  13:54, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, no question. &rarr;Raul654 14:09, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * 1) Snowspinner 15:20, Jun 6, 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Cecropia | Talk 16:04, 6 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) I was going to wait until the end of the month to nominate him, but what the heck. &#8212;No-One Jones 03:37, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC) :-D - David Gerard 23:42, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Nunh-huh 03:41, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Definitely. Rhymeless 04:08, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Meelar 05:01, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) I know it's becoming a cliche to say this here now but I thought he already was one. Support. Angela. 06:45, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) DG is ok. -- Viajero 11:05, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Support.  Known him online since before I knew of Wikipedia.  Smerdis of Tlön 11:50, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) I also thought he already was one.... Level-headed, clear, friendly, and helpful -- will make an excellent sysop. -- BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 11:54, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) older &ne; wiser 14:30, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. Met him at the London WikiMeet and he seems a nice enough chap ;-) --VampWillow 14:34, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) --    ALargeElk | Talk 14:40, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  15:39, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) An excellent choice who perceives with real clarity the issues at this site. Jwrosenzweig 17:08, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. Morwen 18:07, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) Warofdreams 18:24, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Patiently not taking crap from MNH wins him my vote. Alteripse 02:10, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) Michael Snow 16:39, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Merovingian &#8597; T@Lk 05:48, Jun 11, 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) Showed good judgement and restraint when dealing with MNH. Isomorphic 15:42, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 22) Haha, I thought he already was one.  blankfaze | &#8226;­&#8226; 02:35, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 23) Arwel 10:32, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 24) --GeneralPatton 22:51, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 25) john k 20:45, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 26) Fuzheado | Talk 02:05, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 27) 172 02:06, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 28) Danny 02:08, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 29) Neutrality 18:02, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 30) Kingturtle 02:01, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Oppose none Neutral none Comments none