Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Denver20


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Denver20
[ Voice your opinion on this candidate] (talk page) Final (0/5/0); ended 09:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  09:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination
– YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Denver C. (talk) 10:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I would Indent to take part in Patrolling of New Pages and Deleting the Pages which are Against the Wikipedia Publishing rules i.e Pages which have spam and Corrupt content that would spoil the Name of Wikipedia. Also I would Take part in Fighting against Vandalism and Making Sure Users who Practice Vandalism Frequently are Issued Warnings before Begin Blocked or Banned.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I have highly contributed in assessing The New Pages Created and Marking the Pages which have a Bad Content to go For deletion also I have Contributed in Editing Pages which need to Be Updated from Time to Time on the Basis of Their Content.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No, I have not been included in Conflicts of Editing. I Understand that Wikipedia can be Edited by anyone and That the Edits made by a User need to be Factual and Correct to Avoid a Revert. Understanding Users on How their Edit could be Proved Right and How it also Could be Proved Wrong would be the best Solution to Avoid Conflicts during Edits.

General comments

 * Links for Denver20:
 * Edit summary usage for Denver20 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.''

Oppose



 * 1) Oppose explain about this edit
 * 2) Oppose - This candidate has not demonstrated that they can be trusted with adminship. No expertise with AfD, and has created zero articles. Besides, this users first edit was on May 8, 2015. Not now comes into play. This candidate only has 100 edits. This candidate is power hungry, they requested pending-changes here, which was declined.   CookieMonster755   (talk)   20:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose 100 edits=Snow-- ABCDEFADtalk to me 20:51, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Does not understand the CSD process very well. I suggest closing this for SNOWBALL this before it goes too long. π♂101 (talk) 15:23, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.