Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dphantom15


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Dphantom15
[ Voice your opinion] (0/3/0); Scheduled to end 15:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

– This user has been a member of Wikipedia for awhile. They have always tried to help and reverse vandilization. They do a lot of welcoming to new members and scan pages all day long. If there is a page un-notable, they start a debate or tag it! They are one to depend on. This person would NEVER abuse admin access! Dphantom15 15:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I accept to be an admin

I would always help others Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:

I want to be able to delete un-notable pages, reverse vandil, and help others and answer their questions. I would take their requests and do things that are fair
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:

The 2 I am most pleased with are Nicktoons World Online and Nicktropolis. I enjoyed working on them a lot. One I created for someone else, and the other I upgraded. I love to imform people too.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

Well, when one of my pages were deleted, I left a message on the admins' talk page. We figued it out and settled it easy. That is what I want to do.
 * General comments


 * See Dphantom15's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.



Discussion



Support

Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Oppose - you have under 100 edits. Please continue to contribute to Wikipedia and gain more experience. --BigDT 16:08, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) what BigDT said. Suggest withdrawal or early close. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:10, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Sorry, experience is a vital requisite for adminship. We need to be able to see if you can reflect consensus, make smart decisions, etc. Come back in a few months and you'll get some support. -- Chris is me (u/c/t) 16:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.