Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dr. Szląchski


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Dr. Szląchski
Final: (1/4/0) at 08:46, 24 September 2009 (UTC) closed per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTNOW by non-crat \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk).

Nomination
I have made 2,000+contributions to Wikipedia and have been involved in vandal fighting, creating articles, XFDS, cleanup, adoptions and projects Dr. Szląchski (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC).

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A. Helping new users (it has the most potential).


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A. Helping new users because it has the most potential


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. No. I will lose the edit wars unless the other person is violating wikipedia policy.Dr. Szląchski (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Additional optional questions from Unionhawk:
 * 4. What exactly is the role of an administrator?
 * A.Trusted individuals who Deal with vandalism, Page deletion, and Mediation +limit-setting in community disputesDr. Szląchski (talk) 01:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Optional question:
 * 5. You recently made a large number of edits consisting only of removing return marks from pages, like this. Why?
 * A.Cleanup. I have used Autoed to clean up many articles which includes the erasing of extra spaceDr. Szląchski (talk) 02:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC).Also remember you can create an account especially if you want to be involving in RFA'S  if you need any help creating an account please ask me regards Dr. Szląchski  (talk) 02:48, 24 September 2009 (UTC).

General comments

 * Links for Dr. Szląchski:
 * Edit summary usage for Dr. Szląchski can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Mjroots before commenting.''

Discussion

 * Re: the "malformed RfA", see RfA. I am pretty much abstaining unless you give a nomination statement. As roux said on your talk page, you should probably wait a little; I'm sure that after several more months of good editing and hard work, you'd make a fine candidate. Regards, The Earwig  (Talk &#124; Contribs) 00:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Support

 * 1) Support good candidate Dr. Szląchski (talk) 02:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) This is still malformed, but eh. You're just not ready yet. Sorry. → ROUX   ₪  00:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - WP:NOTNOW. Learn what an admin does (somebody strike this if he answers Q4 correctly), gain more contributions, and come back later.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 00:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose I'm sorry Doc, you'll need a little more experience first. — Ched : ?  01:16, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose One of the more amusing interesting RfAs I've seen. Someone SNOW this please. 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? A. No. I will lose the edit wars unless the other person is violating wikipedia policy.Dr. Szląchski (talk) 5:29 pm, Today (UTC−7) ƒ(Δ)² 06:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Just thought I'd clarify, I do not intend to mock the candidate. Just pointing out one of the more interesting RfAs. ƒ(Δ)² 06:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.