Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dschuster17

Dschuster17
[ Vote here]  '''(0/0/0) ending 02:04 3/14/06 9:04 PM! (UTC)'''

– Great User, Great Editor, Great Wikipedian. He will exceed all expectations and much more. Having excellent writing abilities as well as an excellent ability to retain information, Dschuster 17 will prove worthy to be a worthy administrator. Dschuster17 02:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

I herby accept, with full honesty and full respect for the wikipedia community, this nomination to be a Wikipedian administrator.

Support
 * 1) Gbleen
 * 2) Xtreambar
 * 3) JDoorjam
 * btm
 * 1) Moki80
 * 2) Hla5
 * 3) DPBsmith
 * 4) Chan-Ho
 * 5) Jackboland
 * 6) Osbojos
 * 7) Gerkinstock
 * 8) Rushadthomas
 * 9) Twinschick4857

Oppose
 * 1) FatimaGni

Neutral
 * 1) Splace

Comments
 * "Seems Great"
 * "No man could be better"
 * "I once read one of Dschuster17's articles, and I must admit, it was as he put it here- very very good"

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A. As a wikipedia administrator, I plan to edit existing pages, backlogged and all others, as well as compose new pages for the public to utilize and enjoy. I will continue my superb work.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. No article am I most pleased with for, the sole reason, every contribution of mine has been terrific. I am pleased with all my work.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. Never in the past have any editors caused me stress by deleting information or adding any superflorous or false information. I attribute this to my articles greatness. No individual after reading such great articles would feel moral or even "funny" destroying such praiseworthy work. If, however, the future brings naughty individuals who hamper the validity of my work, I will restore the articles to their full glory by using the revert feature given to administrators.