Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/DuctoMan16


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

DuctoMan16
Final (0/27/1) ended 05:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

– DuctoMan, The super hero of tape. DuctoMan 19:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Accepterizing! (That means I accept.)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Strong oppose. Sorry, with 39 edits and less than a month of activity, you are much too new and inexperienced for adminship. If you edit long enough to meet my personal standards, I may vote support in the future. Right now, I'm sorry to say this RFA seems destined for WP:SNOW. --Deathphoenix 19:32, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. User had one article edit at the time he made this request, which was vandalism . android  79  20:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - no community experience, would be unable on the basis of his edit record to apply policies.--A Y  Arktos 20:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Strong Oppose. Are you kidding me? Not a chance in hell. Is stupidity a bannable offense? --maru (talk) contribs 20:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * No, but violations of WP:NPA and WP:BITE can get you blocked for a cool-off period in a hurry. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose.  Obviously WAY too little exp.  - Trysha (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose cute username, though. Get some experience, make some productive edits (that means not the vandalism kind) and who knows? but not now. KillerChihuahua?!? 20:07, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Snowballs. I suggest you withdraw your self-nomination. -- His Imposingness, the Grand Moff Deskana (talk) 20:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose. Experience.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  20:15, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Do I need to say why? M o e   ε  21:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose and asking a 'crat to remove this as dilatory. Jonathunder 21:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose, of course. --kingboyk 21:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose Mjal 21:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose 45 total edits, try again when you get more experience. VegaDark 22:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose, sorry but you need to actually edit a bit before RFAing. Stifle 22:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) STRONG Oppose, only article edit has been vandalism. xaosflux  Talk  / CVU  23:04, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Oppose Heh. -- O bli
 * 13) Oppose - Due to vandalim. No Guru 23:57, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 14) Oppose... --Khoikhoi 00:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 15) Talk) ? 23:38, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 16) Mostly Oppose I thought about a vote of support for the sheer audacity of DuctoMan16, but then this kicked in. A lot more experience is needed here! The Halo 00:49, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 17) Oppose without intending to pile on, but seriously. NSL E (T+C) at 00:53 UTC (2006-03-04)
 * 18) Oppose Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 19) Oppose, per previous history of vandalism. Tito xd (?!? - help us) 02:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 20) Oppose; originally wasn't going to pile on, but his "if it fails, it fails" comment on his talk page welcomes it. joturner 03:15, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 21) Oppose Lets assume good faith. Obviously this newbie doesn't understand that there are certain requirements set before anybody is allowed to become an administrator.  D a Gizza Chat  &#169; 03:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 22) Oppose per joturner. --rogerd 03:45, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
 * 23) Oppose as 100% of his main space edits have been vandalism (i.e. 1/1 of edits). Pepsidrinka 04:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Neutral
 * 1) I'm sorry but I'm going to have to say, u need much more expierence to be an Admin (sysop). Wiki  e Zach|  talk  00:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Comments


 * Edit summary usage: 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. Based on the last 1 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace. Mathbot 19:30, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
 * See DuctoMan16's edit count and contribution tree with Interiot's tool.



Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A. I would like to help stop vandals on Wikipedia.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. No, nothing really big.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. The only problems with my editing are that there are many vandals on my same IP address. If I become an administrator I will try to stop the vandals.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.