Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dynamictwo-o


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Dynamictwo-o
Final (0/5/0); Ended 04:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

- I am the most responsible person in my family. I love helping other people and I really love Wikipedia. I would love to help out Wikipedia in any way in order to keep the knowledge flowing for the millions who are engulfed by it each day. I love learning, I have already learned so much from Wikipedia. Wikipedia has aided my school reports and term essays countless times. I would be thrilled if I was given a chance to give back to the folks at Wikipedia. My last Wiki-boosted report earned me a 108 for the extra info I gave. I would love to help crackdown on the vandalsim going on here. I heard that in the last few days an article was reposted every time it was deleted. That is something I would address. I always take action when the knowledge flow is blocked by people with no life who constantly take away from other peoples learning by interfering with facts and making up crap. I already yell at people who bug others in my scholarly studies. I believe I would be a very good administrator. I would issue warnings, however, if the problem repeated more than 3 times I would block them for 24 hours to give them time to get a life. This is why I wish to be admitted to the honorary position of an administrator. Thank you for your time.Dynamictwo-o 02:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I hope to help address the issue of vandalism. I cannot stand people tampering with the very knowledge that others worked so hard to give our world.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: Not in particular. I joined wikipedia after about 6 years of reading it because I am seeing more and more vandalsim that must be stopped.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No I have not been in any conflicts. In the future I would handle it based on circumstance and I will judge my actions accordingly. I do not prefer force if negotiation is possible.


 * General comments


 * See Dynamictwo-o's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * RfA has not been transcluded onto main RfA page. Please do not make comments until user does so. – Riana talk 04:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Oops! I just saw this in newbie contribs, and I forgot to make sure it had been transcluded onto main RfA page. Sorry. - M s c h e l 11:01, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Someone, please SNOW this. – Chacor 02:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Appears to be an SPA with the SP of RFA. CMummert · talk 02:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion



Support

Oppose
 * 1) Poor answers, no need for tools, self-nom is (pardon me) rubbish. No actual edits. Strong oppose of the highest magnitude. – Chacor 02:47, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose and strongly suggest withdrawal or speedy closure. Misplaced RFA, ten edits and 0% edit summary usage...-- Hús  ö  nd  02:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Unfortunately, 9 edits is not enough to warrant adminship. Come back when you have closer to 2000 or so. Captain panda   In   vino   veritas  02:52, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose. It's really nice you want to help Wikipedia, but you have a lot to learn. Your RfA made me chuckle though. --Deskana (talk)  02:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Strong Oppose You are a good faith editor and I know you want to help Wikipedia but you don't need adminship to do so! Adminship is not an honor, it is more like a janitor's job. See this for more details. If you want to revert vandalism, click here and report vandals here. You have a lot to learn but you're getting there!-- Pre ston  H (Sandbox) •  (Sign Here!) 04:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.