Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/EvilWendyMan


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

EvilWendyMan
FINAL (1/7/2); withdrawn per WP:NOTNOW by EVula at 15:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

- Hello, I'm EvilWendyMan; I would be a good adminstrator because I know how to Wikify articles, and have created three articles, one of which has been deleted. The one that has been deleted was '''ROWDY! Racing News and Mad Minute (Math)'''; the one that is remaining is: Kyocera K325. I created this user because It's named EvilWendyMan because I'm not evil and I'm not a girl, the reason is that it is named after Wendy's Fast Food. Since I started I have over 800 edits. I have my own website so I know what and what not to add to pages. I am a fast learner so I will probably learn the codes fast. I always do external research before editing an important article to Wikipedia so that the program will always get the best information. I learned that if you don't put the appropriate copyright on images, it gets deleted, so I always do copyright. Thank you for reading this presentation about me! EvilWendyMan (talk) 00:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I intend to take part in deleting artices so Wikipedia can be safe for people of all ages.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I love to contribute to NASCAR-related articles because I have racing shortcuts on my Windows Desktop.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have been in at least 10 edit conflicts, and all I do is just stay calm and try again.

General comments

 * See EvilWendyMan's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for EvilWendyMan:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/EvilWendyMan before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) Moral Support WP:NOTNOW. Not enough experience.  Shapiros10  contact me My work  12:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose: I view self-noms as prima facie evidence of power hunger. That and there is a complete lack of understanding on copyright policies, coupled with an extremely low edit count. Sorry, but if you continue on the right path, I'm sure you'll eventually become well qualified. Good luck. seicer  &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs
 * 2) Weak oppose unless I can see some more clueful answers to the questions. Delete what artic[l]es? And what does deleting them have to do with making WP "safe for people of all ages"? As for edit conflicts, can you point me to one you've been in? And what is it that you "try again"? Do you try making the same point, in the same way, to the same people (let's hope not)? My oppose is "weak," by the way, because I hate to oppose RfA's, but I can't in good conscience lend support this early in your wikilearning process. Sorry. Cosmic Latte (talk) 13:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose, sorry but I don't think you've really grasped what admins do yet. I strongly suggest you read the administrator's reading list before you try another RfA - from your answers to questions, you seem to have missed in particular that Wikipedia is not censored and generally what copyright is on Wikipedia. Admins are expected to have good knowledge of Wikipedia's policies and I don't think you've got there yet, unfortunately. ~ mazca  t 14:00, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose and close per WP:SNOW. Less that a thousand edits, no understanding of Wikipedia besides the edit this page button, and desire to censor pages for young'uns. You can't do this. Erik the Red  2 ( AVE · CAESAR ) 14:30, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Sorry, I like your enthusiasm but you are not ready to have the tools just yet. -- Rodhull andemu  15:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose As if the previous opposes weren't clear enough, Q3 seals it. Cheese us kryst, dude, if that isn't a fail I don't know what is.-- Koji Dude  (C) 15:13, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. I'm not going to pile-on, so I'm just going to leave it at that. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Please withdraw now if you wish to avoid unpleasant comments in your direction. You are, I'm afraid, not going to pass and are wholly unqualified to weild the admin tools. Firstly you have no understanding of deletion policy, have no meaningful interaction in the wikipedia namespace so will not understand our core policies. This is reflected in your comment that you want to delete wikipedia to make it safe for all ages. Er, no, that's not going to happen because wikipedia is not censored. Spartaz Humbug! 13:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) WP:NOTNOW, sorry. Please continue with your article editing and creation, and try expanding to a few administrative areas such as WP:AIV, WP:CSD, WP:AfD etc. Once you have some more experience, you're welcome to reapply for adminship. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 13:27, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.