Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Flushing258 3


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Flushing258
'''Final: (1/4/0). Closed per WP:NOTNOW and this by Jac16888 at 03:25, 16 May 2010.'''

Nomination
– YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER Flushing258 (talk) 00:53, 16 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Blocking vandals and deleting temporary wikipedian userpage that they have been indefinitely blocked for a long time at CAT:TEMP.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Improving articles and reverting vandalism.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No.

General comments

 * Links for Flushing258:
 * Edit summary usage for Flushing258 can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Flushing258 before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) Ultra Srong Support. I'd be the first proud supporter of this awesome candidatte for the class of elite enforcers and wiki-guides of the great brotherhood of administrators. Sapporod1965 (talk) 01:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Urm... For a user with only 55 edits, that's quite an eloquent statement.  Adminship is not dictatorship; more of custodianship.  Awesomeness does not make up for lack of experience.-- m o ɳ o  01:36, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Strong Oppose User has 119 edits, with little experience. Closing per WP:NOTNOW.-- m o ɳ o  01:38, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Super Oppose *sighs*    Dwayne   was here!  ♫  01:52, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Concerns with judgment, maturity, breadth of exposure, and policy knowledge. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 02:04, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose. I'm sorry, but with 119 edits and 3 RfAs in the 2 months you've been here, there's no way you're ready. To put things in context for you, I became and admin not long ago and I have over thirteen thousand edits in over a year of editing. You should spend more time working on content and enjoying the wiki and less time worrying about being an administrator (it's not that much fun, trust me!). HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   02:20, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.