Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Gobbleswoggler 3


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Gobbleswoggler
Final: (0/3/0) - closed early per WP:NOTNOW by JamieS93 at 20:03, 7 March 2010 (UTC).

Nomination
– I enjoy wikipedia as i spend most of my day editing football statistics and bringing them up to date. I always update the pc/ntupdate and and put and edit summary. Gobbleswoggler (talk) 19:45, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:Stopping vandalism and helping keeping the football pages up to date.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:updating footballers appearances and goals.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No not really and in the future i would just deal with it in a calm and controlled way.


 * Additional optional questions from Gobbleswoggler
 * Number of question. Question
 * A:

General comments
RfAs for this user: 
 * Links for Gobbleswoggler:
 * Edit summary usage for Gobbleswoggler can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Gobbleswoggler before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose per WP:NOTNOW. You don't need the tools for what you want: for vandalism work, try rollback first. Otherwise, not nearly enough experience throughout the project.  fetch  comms  ☛ 19:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * You just had an unsuccessful RfA less than one month ago. What makes you feel that you've become more experienced since then?  fetch  comms  ☛ 19:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. Obviously a notnow case. You should have known better than to make a third RfA within a month's time, especially considering the feedback and reaction you received after the others.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose per WP:NOTNOW - Doesn't seem to understand what an administrator does, no project space edits, and this is his third request in a month. Please try again in a year or so, not a week from today.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  20:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.