Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Goodandhonestwhig


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Goodandhonestwhig
(0/2/0); Ended 16:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Closed per WP:SNOW. Rudget  ( review ) 16:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

- I wish to improve Wikipedia and fight vandalism. I have learnt my lessons and have been blocked. I wish to help build the finest encyclopedia the world has ever seen! Goodandhonestwhig (talk) 15:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Mainly fighting vandalism.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I have reverted self promotion, and was unfortunatley blocked for attempting to make an article. My boldness must be recognised though!


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Yes, I have been in conflict. I recognise that conflict can be a positive aspect to the encyclopedia though.

General comments

 * See Goodandhonestwhig's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Goodandhonestwhig:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Goodandhonestwhig before commenting.''

Discussion

 * I am contemplating a WP:SNOW closure here, due to many issues with the account in question. I'll wait for a few more opinions first however. Rudget  ( review ) 16:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * If you wish to do so, then that is your concern. The real question you need to ask though is whether Wikipedia needs a user with fresh ideas, free from the politics and the back biting? Most people who go through with this process have been through the trenches so to speak and have ruined themselves and the project by their petty little trench wars. We need people who are removed from that and can add value to the encyclopedia. Goodandhonestwhig (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose - The account was recently blocked for vandalism, and appears also to be a sock. Hiberniantears (talk) 15:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Can I see an example of so called vandalism? Goodandhonestwhig (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose per weather forecast. Close it Rudge.   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  16:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Come on, has no one got a better reason to reject this? Goodandhonestwhig (talk) 16:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.