Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/GregAsche


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

GregAsche
Final  (45/1/0) ending 02:11 October 24 (UTC)

– I would like to nominate GregAsche for adminship. He has been a user in Wikipedia since April 2005 and very active in sinse August, and has racked up more than 2000 edits since then. He is a dedicated editor who is one of the top RC patrolers that is not a admin and also useful in AFD and also rarely keenly avoids conflicts. He deserves the extra admin tools and would make a outstanding admin. JAranda'' | watz sup 02:11, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * He's a really great guy who asks for help when he's not sure, and is bold when he is sure. He communicates well, an admin asset, and all around deserves the tools. Go mop now, and get my coffee. ;-) R  e  dwolf24  (talk&mdash;How's my driving?) 02:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
 * I graciously accept, thank you for the nomination. -Greg Asche (talk) 02:32, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Support Oppose Neutral
 * 1) Extreme Support As nominator JAranda'' | watz sup 02:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Support as Co-nominator. R  e  dwolf24  (talk&mdash;How's my driving?) 02:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Freakishly Strong Support based on my positive interactions with this editor in various fora, particularly Portal:Law. BD2412  talk 02:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) HULK SUPPORT --Merovingian (t) (c) ( e ) 03:52, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) SUPPORT --pgk( talk ) 05:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) That's hot. Mike H (Talking is hot) 06:39, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) The nominator's assertion that he rarely avoids conflicts troubles me. But I will support anyway! Christopher Parham (talk) 06:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Heh, I think he just had a bad choice of words there. -Greg Asche (talk) 12:35, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) Support - have seen some of his edits. Also works, like any other Wiki user would, to revert vandalism. Would be deserved. -- NSLE | Talk 09:22, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Strong support.   [ +t, +c, +m,  +e  ] 10:54, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support MONGO 11:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Support! Kirill Lokshin 12:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Andre ( talk ) 16:49, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. No-brainer.--Scimitar parley 17:47, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Support He isn't already? Privat  e   Butcher  19:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 8)   -- (drini's page| &#x260E; ) 19:21, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Support Very active doing RC patrol. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:44, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Without reservation. -- Essjay ·    Talk 23:08, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Support GregAsche removes vandalism a lot and as a admin he could ban vandalse -- &#9786; A d a m 1213  &#9786;  Talk color="#0000FF"> +|WWW  00:46, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Support, I thought I had voted before, but I hadn't. Good RC Patroller, give him the mop and the flamethrower. Tito xd (?!?) 00:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Indubitably Ral  315   WS  01:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Afford him the keys to the janitor closet. We need more like him, indeed &asymp; jossi fresco &asymp; t &bull; @ 02:10, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Strong Sopport. Or an   e   (t)  (c)   (@)  04:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Support, of course!  Seen 'em around on the RC patrol!!  >: Roby Wayne Talk &bull; Hist &bull; E@ 06:20, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. the wub  "?!"  16:12, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Support Astrotrain 21:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) Great user, just tried to nominate him myself as i didnt realise he already was!  Martin  22:51, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) support it is good to have greg around here Yuckfoo 23:08, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support Have seen some good interventions, and being nominated by Redwolf helps The Minister of War 09:36, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) Support Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   22:12, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Support. A top-notch vandal fighter. Owen&times; &#9742;  23:22, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) Support. When it comes to reverting vandalism, this guy is the Flash!  KHM03 23:49, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Support; he's a good RC patroller, and everything I've seen so far is excellent. Antandrus  (talk) 23:51, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 26) Hai Ryan Norton T 00:05, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 27) Support &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 02:25, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 28) Fir  e  Fo  x  08:15, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 29) Support --Sebastian Kessel Talk 20:03, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 30) Support.  Rob e  rt  00:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 31) Support and congratulations in advance. :)  Hall Monitor 19:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 32) Support. For sure. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:54, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 33) Furry Alien Support - What, not an admin already? Alf melmac 08:32, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 34) Support' Doc (?) 18:08, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 35) Support V. Molotov (talk) [[Image:Flag of California.svg|25px]]  19:33, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 36) Support I thought he was one. Ann Heneghan (talk) 02:24, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 37) Support. GregAsche is a very courteous RC patroller and has sufficiently proven his dedication to this project.  Thatdog 15:12, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 38) Supprt as everyone above. Jkelly 17:33, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
 * 1) --Boothy443 | comhrá 21:10, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Pikachu2.gif|35px]]. &Euml;vilphoenix Burn! 20:15, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. Blocking persistent vandals, clearing the ever growing backlog at AfD, deleting speedys, filling requests for protection and unprotection, and most of all using the admin rollback button on vandalism (although I already use Sam Hocevar's godmode-light.js, but it is a bit slow.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. I've contributed a lot to United States Supreme Court articles such as Republican Party of Minnesota v. White and Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States. I also have probably hundreds of contribs to articles I find on Special:Newpages that I add stub tags too, correct spelling and grammar mistakes, fix formatting, etc.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. I haven't had any serious conflicts yet, mainly anon vandals who I reverted blanking my user page and adding insults, and a few others where I have just backed off before things escalated.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.