Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Hadal

Hadal
User:Hadal has been here since December, 2003 and has about 1,900 contributions. He has made numerous good contributions and has handled himself well with regard to dealing with vandalism and other problems and issues. I think he would make a good admin. Maximus Rex 05:49, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * Wow! I'd like to thank Maximus for the nomination and everyone for their kind comments and support. I've never been one to impose; to make others uncomfortable is not why I'm here. So, assuming there are no express objections to my adminship, I'd be both honoured and happy to accept. I can say in confidence that I will not take my duties lightly. Thanks again! -- Hadal 03:29, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Support:
 * 1) Maximus Rex
 * 2) The time period is shortish, but hard to imagine that I would think differently two months for now. Stan 17:56, 22 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Support gladly. He's very attentive and responsive. This gemmologist will make a friendly admin. --Menchi 09:56, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Perl 00:11, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) I too am concerned a little about the briefness of time here, but I think it's borderline enough that Hadal's good record of edits and combatting the occasional vandal makes him a wise choice. Jwrosenzweig 17:41, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) I think his edits prove him trustworthy. Metasquares 18:28, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Secretlondon 20:20, Feb 26, 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Support, along the same lines as Metasquares. Ryan and/or Mero 06:29, Feb 27, 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) --cprompt 16:54, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) jengod 01:49, Feb 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) --Danny 19:43, 28 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Support. Thought he was one already. &rarr;Raul654 17:58, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Support. Newish, but a good sense of balance. Tannin 20:50, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Support. Good edits, and has been here longer than I had when I became an admin. -- Jake 07:42, 2004 Mar 1 (UTC)

Neutral:
 * 1) Count me as neutral. I do think Hadal is a good choice for adminship, but I'm worried about the fact he's been here less than three months. Angela. 13:57, Feb 22, 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) I'm neutral too. I agree with Angela, while noting he has been very good so far. BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085;  21:01, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)

Oppose:
 * 1) It is simply too soon. We should not set this precedent. I will gladly support Hadal in a few months. Kingturtle 00:33, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) *This sets no precedent. Hadal has been here for 3 months (and has made almost 2 thousand edits in that time), while for example Pakaran was made an admin after only 2 months and 270 edits (after being nominated by RickK). Since I nominated Hadal -- any negative comments about adminship being too early should be directed towards me and not Hadal. Maximus Rex
 * 3) Oppose solely on the grounds that Hadal hasn't been here long enough. RickK 23:13, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Tally: 14 support, 2 neutral, 1 opposed -- ended 05:49, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)