Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Imaglang

Neigel von Teighen Withdrawn request
Vote here (0/8/0) ending 18:26 18 January 2005 (UTC) ended because of withdrewal

I know I'm somewhat new in Wikipedia, but I've been fighting vandalism as much as I can and find. Surely, some of here know my small contributions in cooling discussions. I want to be an admin for preserving order in Wikipedia, specially, where things get dark and problematic. Neigel von Teighen 18:26, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * I withdraw this request as I noticed how blind I was. Thanks you all that made me see my accelerated wills to be an admin. I'll be back, anyway, when I get more experience. Thanks again! --Neigel von Teighen 21:26, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Looks like Imaglang has done some good work but I'd like to see more than 200 edits before I support a Rfa. With more time and edits I would support. Carrp 18:45, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Nice start. Come back after 3 months and 2,000 edits :-) BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 19:17, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Might make a good admin in the future, but it's too soon for me to support until I see more edits, interactions with other Wikipedians, and the test of some more time. Agree with Blankenfaze. -- Infrogmation 20:18, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) 20 article edits... Gzornenplatz 20:34, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) What they said. Neutralitytalk 23:10, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Good user. But not at this moment. If you come back with at least 1,200 edits, I'll probably support. --Lst27 ( t a l k )  00:56, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Sorry, but I'd like to see more experience. --Slowking Man 05:57, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Looks like a great contributor, but I agree with others, needs more edit history. --MPerel 06:35, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments
 * assuming I've counted correcty 191 editsGeni 18:53, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 191 it is, mostly to User, User talk, and Talk namespaces. 18 edits to the article space, as of last week's stats file. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) UE News  21:04, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. I'd like to have more range of action against repeated vandalism and very great diputes where protection may help. Mainly, I would continue patroling vandalism in Wikipedia (as i've been doing) but with some possibility of action.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. I think Succession laws is the best I've done. I'd like also the Dudo article (a chilean dice game I learned there). Mainly, I edit articles: I think I'm not a great article creator.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. No, but I help in disputes as an AMA advocate and as a Harmonious editing club memeber. My best example is the Talk:Atheism sispute, where I helped some members that wanted to cool down the discussion.