Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Imperial Star Destroyer


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Imperial Star Destroyer
(0/2/0); Scheduled to end 17:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC) Closed per WP:NOTNOW  Enigma  message 06:38, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

- I think I'm quite a mature person, and have spent a great editing time on Wikipedia undoing/reverting vandalism. I'm not brilliant with technical stuff, but I make up for it in other ways.


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:

Fighting vandals, and helping out with the community, especiallly new people.
 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:

A large majority of my edits have been reverting vandalism, for which I have got rollback.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

Depends. If a user is helpful I can solve a problem quickly, and if they're being annoying and arkward, I leave a message on that person's talk page. If the guy continues, I wiould deal with it accordingly.

General comments

 * See Imperial Star Destroyer's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Imperial Star Destroyer:
 * I know I'm newish (started in February) but I have some experience on smaller wikis.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Imperial Star Destroyer before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose. Sorry, but 400 edits is not nearly enough to judge competence in admin-related areas.  Sorry, but please try again soon!  weburiedoursecretsinthegarden  06:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) OpposeBased on what I see from your special contributions, you lack the necessary experience to be an administrator. I am unable, at this time, to make a judgment call on your knowledge of policy. Give it another few months and come on back.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 06:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.