Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Inetpup

Inetpup
[ Voice your opinion] (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 09:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

- I'm Inetpup and I've been an editor for about 18 months. I'm gradually learning the ropes; I have friends like User:Mlaroche and User:Cumulus Clouds that have shown me the right way. I had editing problems in the past, but I continue to work hard to resolve them. I saw the RFA process earlier and want to see what happens. I don't expect to win, but I am hoping for at least one vote. Inetpup:o3  ⌈〒⌋▰⌈♎⌋ 09:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

--Inetpup:o3  ⌈〒⌋▰⌈♎⌋ 09:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC) I guess anyone (even an absurd candidate can run for President or Mayor); As for me, I accept the nomination and want to see what transpires. At least during this process, people will scrutinize me and I can learn how to become a better person. Thanks!

Withdrawn. Silly me! --Inetpup:o3  ⌈〒⌋▰⌈♎⌋ 16:21, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

General comments

 * Links for Inetpup:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Inetpup before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Strong Oppose - User has a very poor understanding of policy and has been on a recent campaign to denigrate and demean George Bush. User often performs unilateral POV edits and continues to edit war after they are overridden by consensus. Likewise, this was just downright bizarre and completely irrelevant to the discussion. I see absolutely no evidence of any admin-related work in any of their usual categories. I would probably give it a year before you reapply to give yourself enough time to learn all the necessary information. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 16:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * And if you're looking for pointers on where to improve your editing, your best bet would be to file an editor review, not an RFA. Cumulus Clouds (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Strong Oppose - Though I suspect this page is more of a joke, I oppose on the grounds that Inetpup commits frequent acts of vandalism, including adding misinformation, jokes, and nonsense to articles. Wikipedia: serious business.  FlyingToaster (talk) 21:36, 17 July 2008 (UTC)


 * See this. Please do not edit further as this was withdrawn several days ago; further voting such as voting by User:FlyingToaster after my withdrawal with be considered Vandalism. Thanks!  --Inetpup:o3   ⌈〒⌋▰⌈♎⌋ 07:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)