Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/IslaamMaged126


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

IslaamMaged126
FINAL (0/5/1); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 16:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

-


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:I intend to revert vandalism and post warning messages.I'd like to know a bit more.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:ever since I found out hat anyone can help stop vandalism on the encyclopedia,I have been trying to take part in that.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:I can't really remeber any conflicts that caused stress,but I remember once that I continued to revert work on Islaam Maged.The work was reverted several times,but it didn't cause stress

General comments

 * See IslaamMaged126's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for IslaamMaged126:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/IslaamMaged126 before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) I'm sorry, but I don't think that you're ready for this yet. Administrators are user who generally do a lot of important work in Wikipedia. I hope you understand that you cannot make it this time. Try again after you know more about Wikipedia. -- Zachary crimsonwolf  14:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * No we're not. We're normal, unimportant and usually quite insane users who get to slave away keeping Wikipedia clean from junk. Nick 15:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) You would also do well to fix your grammar, such as leaving spaces after punctuation, and come across as more professional. I think you may have been nominated out of friendship rather than contributions to Wikipedia. -- Dlae The Freudian Slip 14:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * In response to Nick, cleaning Wikipedia is important work. Can you imagine a public washroom without a janitor (just a rough picture)? By the way, Dlae, I think you got an eeensy bitsy problem there:IslaamMaged126 nominated him/herself. There's no "nominated out of friendship" thing. -- Zachary crimsonwolf  15:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose has not shown dedication to the project. I'm also concerned with the lack of experience. (account created on October 27, 2007) Suggest closure.&mdash; trey  omg he's back 14:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose You only have about 106 edits, which is far too low. The lack of experience here is a concern. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:28, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose. Not enough experience, only being an editor for a couple weeks and a hundred total edits.  Answers to questions do not show a need for the tools, either.  I recommend withdrawing this RFA, it's going to WP:SNOW and trying again in a few months.  If you ever have any questions about anything, feel free to contact me on my talk page.  Useight 15:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Clearly not ready.--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 15:26, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.