Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/James1011R


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

James1011R
Final (0/6/0); ended 20:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW  So  Why  20:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination
– This user requests adminship for these reasons:

1. To revert vandalism without needing to view diffs (rollback)

2. To edit articlespace more often (only edits in articlespace are vandalism reversions and minor.

3. To be bold

4. To be able to stop vandals from vandalising

5. Deletion of pages according to deletion policy. (i.e. only if on XfD and result is "delete", or CSD'd)

6. To be useful (i.e. clear backlogs if possible) James1011R (talk, contribs) 15:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Rollbacking and deletions


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: My reversions of vandalism, because Wikipedia should be in operation condition.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Deletion of Forge.

General comments

 * Links for James1011R:
 * Edit summary usage for James1011R can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) WP:NOTNOW. Just over 600 edits, only 20 in Article Space. Simply not enough information to judge this User on. I would suggest he apply for WP:ROLLBACK, instead. Achowat (talk) 18:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) WP:NOTNOW. Sorry, James, but if you think you need the admin tools to stop vandals, you don't know enough about this place yet. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk)  19:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 3) Lacking....a lot. Not too sure about rollback either, looking at the candidate's talk page.  Leaky  Caldron  19:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 4) Not nearly enough edits, and your answers to the questions don't inspire any confidence I'm afraid. GiantSnowman 19:05, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 5) WP:NOTNOW. Cryptic answers to questions do not show perspective. Glrx (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 6) For reasons listed above. I don't think even a "rollback" right would be made available at this stage. &mdash; Vensatry  (Ping me)  20:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.