Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JeremyA

JeremyA
final (30/0/0) ending 5:07 16 June 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm pleased to nominate JeremyA. I keep running into him on RC patrol, as he reverts vandalism by hand faster than I can do it with the rollback button.  He seems active in all areas of Wikipedia: fighting vandals,  beginning articles, expanding others.  And all this with a near-religious use of the "edit summary" function.  Joyous 05:10, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * I accept the nomination, thank you.  JeremyA 05:16, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Support Oppose
 * 1) Support happily. Joyous 05:11, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Sure. Everyking 05:14, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Definitely. --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 05:18, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Looks good to me: Support Kelly Martin 05:25, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) We need RC cola, patrol work! Keep it up!--Jondel 05:27, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. I have great admiration for dilligent janitors on RC Patrol. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:26, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Support. Looks good, JeremyA. You seem like a clear-headed and responsible editor, and I like what I'm seeing with the RC patrol. You have made more than your share of substantial new articles, and I think that we need people who are both article-writers as well as janitors. Unless I've overlooked something major, your record looks clean, and I have no second thoughts about giving you my support. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 11:52, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. Good history reverting vandalism. Bluemoose 14:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Looks a good user, and would make a fine admin.  smoddy 20:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Support. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 21:47, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Support.-gadfium 02:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Absolutely. Like Joy, I'm quite impressed by Jeremy's vandal-fighting kung fu. -- Hadal 04:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Of course. Joyous has a good taste for admins ;-). Shanes 05:09, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Support --Spangineer (háblame)  16:08, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Support. JYolkowski // talk 20:43, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. El_C 23:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. JuntungWu 03:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Support - RC patrol 4 lyfe. --FCYTravis 03:54, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) Support. Someone should design an RC Patrol insignia, or perhaps even a uniform. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 05:23, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Support 100% I've always stated that a person with the makings of a great administrator should have a balance between working behind the scenes doing chores and contributing written articles. JeremyA has proven that he is an asset to the Wiki project and therefore, can be trusted with admin powers.  Marine 69-71 04:19, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support Awesome RC patrolling. Awesome. Bratsche talk  5 pillars 03:03, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) Support. Very impressive RC patrolling.  Great admin material. --Canderson7 01:52, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Support. Good edit history. func (talk) 03:24, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) Support. --Kbdank71 16:21, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Support. No doubt. utcursch | talk 06:06, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * 26) Support. --Theo (Talk) 11:25, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 27) Support. SlimVirgin (talk) 14:37, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * 28) Support. &rarr;  Jarlaxle Artemis   03:18, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * 29) Support; everything I have seen is good. I bump into him on RC patrol a lot; give the man the keys to the mop room. Antandrus  (talk)  03:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * 30) Support. Shiri &mdash; Talk 03:46, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

Comments
 * Edit counts, for those who care: Main 1980/50, User 149/190, Wikipedia 231/0, Image 191/0, Template 13/2, Category 4/0; total 2810. Kelly Martin 05:25, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. I do a fair amount of RC patrol already, and being an admin would help me with this. I also anticipate helping in closing VfD debates and cleaning up CSD.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. There is no one article that I would hold up as my best. However, I am pleased with my contributions to the group of articles about the Districts of Sheffield. When I started editing these were mostly short stubs, or just non-existent articles red-linked from the main Sheffield page. This is still a work in progress, but I feel that the 28 articles that I created to group all the district articles into have progressed well&mdash;of these Ecclesall is probably the best so far.
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. I haven't had any large conflicts so far. I have some minor disagreements with other editors. Sometimes looking back at these situations I feel that initially I react badly, but so far I think that I have managed to make ammends whenever I have made mistakes. I think that I have learnt a lot from watching other conflicts from the sidelines, there are definitely some editors who are gifted at dealing with conflicts and I hope that I can learn from them. In particular, I have noticed on a number of occasions how a well written edit can satisfy all parties in a conflict.