Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jet123 (2nd nom)


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Jet123
Final (0/10/0); Ended 05:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

- I like to patrol Wikipedia to catch vandals and give them a warning. I clean pages and revert pages before. Now, I use an edit summary to tell other users what I edited. I even edited on the Central Wikia. I will make Wikipedia the best encycloedia on the Internet. If you want me to clean vandalism, I will do it. Jet123 My talk page 00:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I can clean vandalism.  Jet123 My talk page 00:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with?
 * A: Cleaning vandalism and blocking vandals.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: Two articles; Wikia, Wikipedia.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Yes, I have been in edit conflicts and this made me mad.


 * General comments


 * See Jet123's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.



Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion
 * As indicated by Alison's comment and the discussion in your earlier RfA, you simply do not have enough experience yet to be granted for adminship. I suggest that you withdraw this RfA, continue making contributions, and ask a trusted, more experienced user before you apply again. Your contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, nonetheless. Newyorkbrad 00:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You are a fine editor, Jet123, but Newyorkbrad has a point. Also, you can get some good feedback at editor review and some assistance at admin coaching. -- Jreferee 02:22, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose - I'm sorry. It's only been three weeks since your last RFA and you really need to build up a little more experience here. But your contributions to-date have been excellent and I'm confident that in a few more months you'll be ready for the mop -  Alison ☺ 00:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Not even 200 edits and not even two months experience. Michael 00:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Not enough experience, doesn't know that Wikia isn't connected with Wikimedia, too eager (is trying for admin at Central Wikia too), signature is way too big.  I suggest withdrawing. John Reaves (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose I understand that you want to help, but get some more experience by doing things like: editing around the project, reporting repeat vandals to WP:AIV, and taking part in policy making.  Then you will be ready in a few months time.  Darth  griz 98 01:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose and withdraw please. -  An as  talk? 01:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose -- Suggest withdrawal per WP:SNOW. Real96 02:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose per above voting reasons. Captain   panda  02:16, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose, there's way more to adminship than vandal blocking.-- Wizardman 02:28, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose While I admire your eagerness, you just don't yet have the experience. Suggest withdrawal HornandsoccerTalk 02:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose - Withdraw, get some more experience, think of better answers and try again in a few months-- $U IT  04:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.