Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jmclark911


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Jmclark911
Final (0/5/0) ended 22:32, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

– A great man, opposing vandilism. Vote for Jmclark911 15:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

I think it's a great honor to be nominated. Jmclark911 22:21, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Support I support many WikiProjects, and I am a member of the Counter Vandilisam Unit.

Oppose I oppose vandilisam, and people performing copyright infringment. Neutral I am neutral about allowing everyone being allowed to edit.
 * Oppose. Very uniquely malformed RfA. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 22:17, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. What Deskana said. Mr.   L  e  fty   Talk to me!  22:19, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Oppose. Please try again with a properly-formatted nomination.  Nacon kantari  22:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This nomination is too early. Please come back in some months. --Ton e  22:23, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Oppose Malformed RfA, poor responses, etc. Yanksox 22:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Comments


 * See Jmclark911's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.



Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters: Sure
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: : My goal would be to help with all of them.


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:: With being part of WikiProject Electronics, I am pleased with all technology articles.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:: No, but I'd just calmly leave a message on the user's talk page, and wait for them to respond.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.