Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Johnleemk

Johnleemk
I have been a Wikipedia member since September 2003 and have contributed a little over 1000 edits to the English Wikipedia since then, and one or two dozen edits on the Malay Wikipedia. I have not been involved in any edit disputes, and I believe I have sufficient understanding of Wikiquette. I am requesting adminship to assist in administering VfD and speedy deleting patent nonsense (I used to follow recent changes a lot but have been unable to do so recently due to lack of time). I understand if I am considered too new to become an admin, especially since this is a self-nomination, and will not mind if you can provide constructive comments on my manner of contributing to Wikipedia, regardless of whether you support this nomination. Johnleemk | Talk 12:54, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) OK by me - David Gerard 13:44, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) A solid, relatively long-time contributor that I believe could handle sysop duties easily. -- David Remahl 03:05, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Lst27 03:43, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) I too believe in quality over quantity and your contributions definitely have quality. -JCarriker 09:01, Jun 20, 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Qualified, has shown a good grasp of policy and etiquette. &#8212;No-One Jones 12:42, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Quality over quantity. Calm and well-spoken in exchanges with other editors. Wile E. Heresiarch 17:32, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) While he doesn't quite have a comfortable quantity of edits, I trust him and I hope sysoping him can boost his contribution. &#9999; Sverdrup 01:37, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Quality over quantity, indeed. Cribcage 03:33, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) After consideration an review of your edits, I've decided to support.  Not that it matters.  You have a healthy amount of support already.  Quality over quantity, I concede.  I just hope you're more active in the future! blankfaze | &#8226;­&#8226; 04:35, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Seems a good contributor, and certainly VfD needs more people willing to maintain it (IMO). Jwrosenzweig 16:09, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Cecropia | Talk 19:23, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Support --"D ICK " C HENEY 20:50, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Seen good work on many articles. Fuzheado | Talk 01:35, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) James F. (talk) 03:37, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1000 edits? I've only been here since April and I have almost 2000.  I'm kind of wary of supporting someone with only 1000 edits if they're self-nominating.  The guidelines say 500-1000 edits are necessary before people should consider your nomination seriously.  It also says self-nominators should "wait until you exceed the usual guidelines by a good measure.  Oppose, for now, but I am open to reconsidering.  blankfaze | &#8226;­&#8226; 02:55, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Yes, I read the guidelines. However, I believe in quality, not quantity. I agree that most of my edits are inconsequential, but I have contributed to several articles. I helped bring The Beatles up to featured level. I have written non-stub articles on subjects not covered extensively in Wikipedia, such as Bandar Utama (if American towns have articles, so can any other nation) and Persekutuan Pengakap Malaysia. I created the boxes for the various Prime Ministers of Malaysia. I helped start Malaysian general election, 2004 and Malaysian general election. I also believe that given how long I've been on Wikipedia, I have been able to sufficiently understand the various policies, etc. of Wikipedia. I have actually contributed even before September last year, as an anonymous user (I wrote 95% of Education in Malaysia). Johnleemk | Talk 06:20, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * 1) No offense to Johnleemk - but for now, I oppose. I think it is still to soon to judge. Kingturtle 01:57, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) jengod 23:14, Jun 25, 2004 (UTC)

Neutral


 * 1) This may sound unusual, but I'm neutral only because of this user's relatively few discussions on his talk page and other talk pages. While this is probably a good sign, I feel it's important to be able to gauge how a prospective admin relates directly to other users, as well as editing articles. BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 13:35, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)