Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jonjonbt 3


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Jonjonbt
FINAL (1/6/0); withdrawn by candidate 13 August 2007

- My previous RfA had widely failed, but I feel I have gained much more experience since then. Most people mijudged me because of that I am 11, and I now understand that. However, I am more mature and intelligent than most 11-year-olds, as I have been offered a tip to Europe, so that must mean I am mature nd intelligent. However, that was when I was a really young Wikipedian, and I had no idea what I was doing. Once again, I have gained much more experience since then, and I feel it is time for me to try again at getting adminship. I sincerely hope you will promote me this time. Thank you for any consideration.  J o nj on b t  17:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: I intend to take part in blocking vandals, and protecting high-risk pages and templates, and that's about it.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I think most of my contributions are equal, and some may be better than others, but it's pretty hard to choose between them.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have been in one edit conflict before, on the Nicktropolis article, due to a NPOV issue, but it has since been resolved. If I get in any more edit conflicts, I will deal with it peacefully, as I did with the conflict above.

General comments

 * See Jonjonbt's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Jonjonbt:

''Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Jonjonbt before commenting.''

Discussion


Support
 * 1) Moral support - Some of the answers to the questions are a little short. Consider joining a Wikipedia or contribute to a Deletion discussion.  Mi r a n da   17:58, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose. You don't have very substantial contributions in anything involving admin tools, and I don't trust your judgment after this.-Wafulz 17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) (ec)Oppose - Less than 900 edits, one-third of which are to user page. Needs more experience. Lara  ♥Love  17:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose - I have worked with this editor however feel they do not truly understand what this project is completley about. This is evidenced by lack of mainspace (< 300) edits and short time since last RFA.  I have reccomended he withdraw this RFA and give it several months. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:50, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose - no apparent improvement since last RFA. – Chacor 17:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) (edit conflict with everyone else, I guess I'm slow) Oppose, after reading your post in this thread on the Simtropolis forum. Not only does it put Wikipedia in a bad light, you're also wrong. It doesn't show the maturity you claim to have, nor does it show a good knowledge of what work admins do and on what grounds they warn and block people.--Atlan (talk) 17:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose - Sorry, but with under 1,000 contributions I just don't think it is quite time yet. I hope you do continue editing and perhaps reapply when you gain some further experience. Keep it up and best of luck though! Eric Wester 17:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Neutral