Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Joolz

Joolz
[ Vote here] (35/0/0) ending 00:32 9 September 2005 (UTC) - Joolz is a really friendly guy, who I've collaborated with on a number of articles and projects. He's level-headed, he's got the right mindset, and I don't doubt that he'll be an excellent administrator (he is currently an administrator on Commons). Plus, he might get a comb in the janitor kit. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:32, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow! Thanks Talrias, I accept :) -- Joolz 13:20, 2 September 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) I give Joolz my full support. Talrias (t | e | c) 00:40, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 2) Support --  Jtkiefer  T - 00:49, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) Support. Just take a look through his contributions - it's quite obvious that he will do a great job of administrating Wikipedia with all this work and experience. &mdash; Stevey7788 (talk) 00:58, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Support, I think Stevey has said it all already. Rje 02:08, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Thought he was one. --Merovingian (t) (c) 02:17, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support, SqueakBox 02:38, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Support FOR GREAT JUSTICE! (I've seen some of his edits on RC patrol and they are quite good) Ryan Norton T 06:54, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) Support. Excellent contributor. Sjakkalle (Check!)  13:52, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) Support: Solid contributor, reasonable dispute resolution, nice distribution of edits. I'd be surprised if someone votes Oppose barring any revelations of behavior misconduct. --Durin 14:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Support THEY SET UP US THE POV -- Phroziac  ( talk ) 15:59, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 11)   Journalist  C./ Holla @ me! 
 * 12) Seems like a responsible user. Andre ( talk ) 17:19, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Support, seems deserving of sysop rights. --Sn0wflake 01:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) --Jusjih 03:47, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) BRIAN 0918  &bull; 2005-09-3 04:06
 * 16) Support. Another reasonable person who can be trusted to do the job well. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:15, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Super strong support on wheels! I had planned to nominate him myself a few weeks ago. Joolz will make a fine admin. &mdash; Trilobite 14:55, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Yup Fire Fox T  C 15:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) For sure. violet/riga (t) 17:17, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Of course. Falphin 20:36, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) Support Solid contributor. Surprised that this user was not one already. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 23:35, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 22) That's hot. Mike H (Talking is hot) 02:06, September 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Supporting. Denelson83 05:01, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) You supported me, I'll support you. N (t/c) 16:15, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Strong support. the wub  "?/!"  16:49, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 26) Support. Warren Harding approves of this user. R  e  dwolf24  (talk) 21:28, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 27) Support. --MarkSweep &#x270D; 16:43, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 28) Strong support Proto t c 11:24, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 29) Support. El_C 23:58, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 30) Good man.— encephalon έγκέφαλος   18:09:22, 2005-09-07 (UTC)
 * 31) Support. --NormanEinstein 03:52, September 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * 32) David Gerard 14:14, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 33) Support. I haven't had much interaction with Joolz, but recently he was remarkably insightful, not to mention friendly. He'll make a fine admin. I'd caution slightly that the best decisions are made in the full flux of on-wiki discussions, rather than on IRC, but as an admin on Commons I'm sure he already knows that. -Splash 22:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 34) Support no prob with this one. Alf melmac 22:37, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * 35) Support, with a broom, strongly. -- BD2412 talk 23:18, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. I'd like to help with basically anything that needs dealing with, such as the VFD AFD backlog or the copyright problems backlog. I'd also like to help with requested moves which need administrator intervention. You might also want to see my commons contributions and administrator actions on commons.
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. I'm proud of my efforts on the constituency project and Newbury (UK Parliament constituency) in particular because it contains things which aren't available elsewhere on the internet (the 1885-1950 results). I like to see wikipedia improve so I'm proud of any of my edits which have helped raise the standard, even a little bit ;)
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A. I have been involved in conflicts, I think sometimes it's inevitable and impossible to avoid sometimes, the important thing is when a conflict occurs that it doesn't escalate into a revert war or something nastier. I'm currently in a disagreement with someone over Castro's placement on the Cult of personality article (see Talk:Cult of personality) - if I get stressed at any time (which is in itself rare) I deal with it by staying away from that article until I'm calmer - I can't think of any particular time where I've been properly stressed though, not yet at least :)