Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Juggernaut0102


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Juggernaut0102
FINAL (1/10/2); withdrawn per WP:SNOW by EVula at 14:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Stopping vandalism, and always constructively adding to pages I visit to read.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I have been in a conflict with the Internet Explorer article on Wikipedia, more specifically in the criticism section, but the problem has been resolved.

General comments

 * Links for Juggernaut0102:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Juggernaut0102 before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) Moral support. You are clearly not ready yet, and it may be a good idea to withdraw for now. However, keep editing and ideally let someone nominate you in a few months. Good luck. — Dorftrottel⁠ 13:12, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose Nothing that I can see to base trust off of with this user, only edits are to Internet Explorer related articles(handful), and Marconi(twice), Recommend withdrawing and coming back with some more mainspace editing under your belt. -Dureo 08:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose - When a user only has about a dozen real edits (not edits to his own user page or to WP:SANDBOX), the forst of which was 2 months ago, he isn't yet ready for adminship. Od Mishehu 09:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) No - but there is potential here. -- Anonymous Dissident  Talk 09:46, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Inexperience, suggest withdrawing at this stage.  Daniel  10:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose weak answers and inexperience. Try to participate on WP:XFD, use the edit summary every time, install Mozilla Firefox with WP:TW to do a better RC patrolling. More than half of edits to your user page and not to other areas is also a problem that you should resolve. Good luck. Carlosguitar 11:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose No, per above. Jmlk  1  7  11:44, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose Inexperience. Qst  13:15, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 8) Oppose Has not even answered question 2. I suggest you withdraw from this nomination and do not feel discouraged because of this. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 13:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose No, no, no. Frankly, I'd need to see an awful lot more to even consider. Keepscases 14:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose, and recommend closure per WP:SNOW, by someone with the power to do so. Barely over 100 edits--the majority of them to userspace--does not qualify one for adminship. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kscottbailey (talk • contribs) 14:17, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

 * 1) Neutral Recommend withdrawing due to lack of experience, You can still work on reverting vandalism contributing to the encyclopedia in the mean time, see: WP:WEL & WP:VAN on what steps to take. ▪◦▪ ≡ЅiREX≡ Talk 09:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) You need more time here. If you improve I will definatly support you in the future:) Happy editing!--SJP:Happy Verterans Day! 13:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.