Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kalajan


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Kalajan
FINAL (1/4/0); closed by EVula per WP:NOTNOW at 16:39, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

– Likes to express his opinion and won't stop until he is given a reason... Intrepid, and with good writing skills, has written a bookKalajan (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Making sure no one verbally attacks other users, and sort out conflicts without any swears, curses... In drastic cases a user may be blocked, but my opinion is that they must be given chances to express their opinions without insults.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: I hope I can contribute in the best way with all the WWE Wresting articles, (including wrestlers, different brands, the company itself, and solving all edit wars). The reason why I usually edit WWE Wrestling articles is because of my knowledge that Wikipedia includes, WWE is the best bit I know about.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I always ask for reasons, and proof coming from reliable sources. I was once blocked without any reason for doing so, and I hope that by becoming an Admin, I can resolve such things.

General comments

 * See Kalajan's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Kalajan:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Kalajan before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) Moral Support - Please continue to edit Wikipedia and build up your experience in administrative areas, as well as building content, and reapply in a few months or so if you so feel the need. Remember, adminship is no big deal and just because this RfA will fail does not mean that future ones will. Kind regards. NW&#39;s Public Sock (talk) 16:16, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose - not nearly enough experience demonstrated on the project. Suggest withdrawal or close per WP:NOTNOW. // roux   15:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose While I welcome your desire to contribute to Wikipedia.User has been around since March 2008 and has only 248 edits hence would recommend you try later as per WP:NOTNOW.Sorry but good luck .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 16:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Q1 doesn't really explain a need for the tools, and Q3 confuses me. You say you were blocked but your log's clean... Wizardman  16:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The candidate was apparently an unintended victim of a proxy band that had been resolved.  Hazardous   Matt   16:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose. Too few edits, and your answer to Q3 does not explain how exactly will adminship help resolve an issue like this. Your answer to Q1 does not explain why you even need an admin's tools for such tasks. Maybe when you get more experience... --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.