Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Lavakille


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

lavakille
Final (0/13/0) ended 10:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

– This was a self nom, I just fixed it up


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Oppose - malformed RfA - only rationale is "I am a good user" -- Tawker 06:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Indeed, his only article edits are vandalism, too. --Rory096 07:44, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Oppose, of course, suggest withdrawal. --Rory096 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose 21 edits, 14 of which are to their userpage. VegaDark 07:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose practically no experience. Ben W Bell talk  07:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose, fails 1FA. - Mailer Diablo 07:58, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose suggest close immediately under SNOWBALL. Tyrenius 08:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose This is not really that funny. Voice -of-  All Talk 08:12, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 7) Opppose Per above.--A n de h 08:35, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 8) What a joke. --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 08:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 9) Oppose needs to withdraw.-- Joe Jklin  ( T C )  09:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 10) Oppose Come back in a few months with some more experience and try again. Don't give up, you're just too new for people to know you well enough and determine your trustworthiness.  Captainj 10:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 11) Oppose Is this a joke? No experience at all. Please try again after 4 months. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  10:18, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * 12) Oppose - per Siva1979 (when Siva votes to oppose, that's really saying something!). Zaxem 10:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Neutral Comments


 * See lavakille's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.

Username Lavakille Total edits 21 Distinct pages edited 4 Average edits/page 5.250 First edit 18:36, May 21, 2006 (main) 3 User 14 Wikipedia 4
 * Count with Tool2:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I am a good user in Wikipedia so I be a admin


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.