Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Louis Taylor


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Louis Taylor
Final (0/7/0) Ended 4 April 2010, 01:10 (UTC) Closed by Chaser per WP:SNOW.

Nomination
– I work hard to stop people from doing false edits Louis Taylor (talk) 03:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Musical Artists and albums.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: The-Dream article I think because before it had no picture, now it does but Im trying hard to improve many articles.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Some people have caused me stress have but in the end I notice it goes down well.

General comments

 * Links for Louis Taylor:
 * Edit summary usage for Louis Taylor can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Louis Taylor before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) "Musical artists and albums" is not an area of administrative work. Nakon  00:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose I'm sorry, and while I hate editcountitis, 365 edits just isn't enough to pass an RfA. Please come back in 4-5 months with 4-5 thousand edits. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 00:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose I'm sorry, but as I said on your talk page you have insufficient edits to prove you've been trusted. This is a case of WP:NOTNOW-- SKATER  Speak. 00:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose as you are inexperienced. This is a waste of time and should be withdrawn as soon as possible.  Aiken   &#9835;   00:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose Well intentioned self nom, but nowhere near ready per q's. Please keep up your good intentions and come back several thousand edits/several months from now. Doc Quintana (talk) 00:18, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose please look at WP:ADMIN and WP:NOTNOW. Admins do much more than preventing false edits, which you can do without being an admin anyhow.  fetch  comms  ☛ 00:36, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose - User doesn't seem to comprehend the actual role of an administrator. Spend some more time actively editing and familiarize yourself, then return.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 01:04, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Neutral



 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.