Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mikkalai

Mikkalai
Mikkalai has about 1969 edits in about 2½ months. Lots of sensible edits to mathematical articles, and other topics. &#922;&#963;&#965;&#960; Cyp    23:08, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Support Tuf-Kat 23:28, Jan 30, 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. I found this user to be able to discuss contentious issues in a reasonable manner, showing respect for sources, as well as differing opinions. I think they will use any authority granted them in a cautious, and judicious manner. Jack 21:54, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
 * Support cautiously. I think he's a fine user with a good track record, but he hasn't been here as long as I'd like. But, with the new de-sysop option, I'm more encouraged to support him. &rarr;Raul654 01:27, Feb 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * What do people think about Mikkalai separating out the story of the lost Jews of Carpathian Ruthenia into a separate ghetto article? How about suppression of information? Does Mikkalai show admin behavior? This may be an interesting contributor in his fields, but not an appropriate admin, IMO. Wetman 04:44, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * I have reviewed the above objection, and I do not see it as substantive in regards to Mikkalai's request for adminship. This appears to be a very tender subject, w unfriendliness on the talk (which Mikkalai has not engaged in) and to be perfectly frank, I agree w what Mikkalai did, creating a seperate article for a contentious issue. The Carpathian Ruthenia needs alot of work, and he seems to be a part of making it better. Jack 07:31, 2 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Strongly support! I totally concur with both of JackLynch's statements above. He'd make a great member of the conflict resolution team as well. 172 02:11, 7 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. Yorick, Jester of Elsinore 03:52, 2004 Feb 8 (UTC)
 * Support - &#22823;&#23558;&#20891;, &#37117;&#30563;&#20013;&#22806;&#35832;&#20891;&#20107; (talk) 03:05, 10 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support. -- Warofdreams 16:13, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * Support--Hemanshu 17:55, 17 Feb 2004 (UTC)