Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mkmcconn

Mkmcconn
Mkmcconn has been here since September 2002 with over 3200 edits to his credit. He is especially good, in my experience, at untangling and defusing disputes over content of religion-based articles....a dangerous business indeed, and one that I think we are long overdue in rewarding with adminship. Jwrosenzweig 03:48, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)


 * Sincerely, thank you for the expressions of confidence. I am willing to serve, if the nomination is sustained. Mkmcconn 21:38, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Support:
 * 1) Jwrosenzweig
 * 2) RickK 04:00, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Maximus Rex 04:02, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) cprompt 08:31, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Pfortuny 09:03, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Graham :) 17:53, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) BCorr ¤ &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 21:01, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Showed great composure and balance in the Creationism debate a few months back. KRS 08:15, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Uncle Ed 16:14, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Heartily support. -- Kaihsu 17:42, 2004 Mar 1 (UTC)
 * 11) Smerdis of Tlön 21:41, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Luis Dantas 21:58, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Michael Snow 23:48, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Tuf-Kat 05:38, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Pollinator 18:22, 3 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Fair, knowledgable, affable and indispensable. Wikipedia is fortunate to have him as a regular contributor. His compatriots on religion articles, Wesley and Visorstuff, would also be good admins if they are willing to accept the responsibility. B 22:55, Mar 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) Support. Angela. 03:52, Mar 5, 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Support. -- Jake 07:33, 2004 Mar 5 (UTC)
 * 19) Support. We need more admins in his interest areas and he's great. -Visorstuff 17:34, 5 Mar 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Support. On top of the qualities already listed, he's a good writer, and knowledgable. Wesley 04:58, 6 Mar 2004 (UTC)