Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/MykReeve

MykReeve
Dr Reeve has been around for a few months, and has contributed good articles and some very nice images. I have not checked the number of edits, but the quality may be seen in the exemplar Royal Exchange and Royal Oak (tree). -- Kaihsu 23:06, 2004 May 1 (UTC)


 * I'm pleased and flattered to accept the nomination. Thanks! - MykReeve 18:54, 2 May 2004 (UTC)

Support:
 * 1) Kaihsu 23:06, 2004 May 1 (UTC)
 * 2) fabiform | talk 23:20, 1 May 2004 (UTC) Myk's a good calm editor who'd make a great admin.
 * 3) theresa knott 00:19, 2 May 2004 (UTC) I thought he was one already
 * 4) Nice writings. --Menchi 00:22, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) 550 edits is plenty for me, esp. when they're of quality. Meelar 00:52, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Maximus Rex 01:30, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) A review shows generally calm and composed behavior while working on the alternative medicine articles. Isomorphic 02:20, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Contributor since December 14, 2003. I'm not concerned with frequency or number of edits: He's been around awhile, and he produces quality work. I support 100%. Cribcage 03:02, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Much excellence. Seth Ilys 05:56, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Angela
 * 11) Calm and thoughful. BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 11:27, May 2, 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Danny 16:00, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Wikipedia is not an exclusive country club: adminship should be granted based on qualitative performance, not quantitative, IMHO. --"D ICK " C HENEY 19:05, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Guanaco 19:32, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Stewart Adcock 00:29, 3 May 2004 (UTC) More than enough edits for me to conclude that he'd make a trustworthy admin.
 * 16) I don't know what 200-300 more edits would tell me that the excellent 500+ haven't already -- there's been plenty of time for Myk to get into trouble if that was coming. Does very solid work, in my experience. Jwrosenzweig 16:10, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) His work so far is good enough evidence of qualifications. Let's not set our edit count expectations so high that people have to make Wikipedia a full-time job for six months to become admin. --Michael Snow 16:48, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Support. Supersolid, involved contributions. Good choice. jengod 20:07, May 3, 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) 172 22:58, 3 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Support. User has ~= 650 edits. He takes pictures, too! :) - Fennec 13:26, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) Support. &rarr;Raul654 23:06, May 4, 2004 (UTC)
 * 22) Gaz 14:35, 5 May 2004 (UTC)

Oppose:
 * 1) Far too few edits, IMHO. Kingturtle 00:50, 2 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Maybe in a couple more months. RickK 00:53, 2 May 2004