Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/NewFranco


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

NewFranco
[ Voice your opinion on this candidate ] (talk page) Final (0/6/0); ended 13:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) - Closing per Snow and WP:NOTYET, per a clear consensious below. (non-admin closure) Mdann52 (talk) 13:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC) 

Nomination
– I've been on Wikipedia for three months. I used to edit as a IP address. My interest was shows, companies and channels. I've worked hard over the years. Wikipedia influenced my life because of the articles I readNewFranco (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A:


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:


 * 4. Question from Kiefer.Wolfowitz
 * Do 248 responses of "Fully qualified candidate. Newyorkbrad" set a good tone for the evaluation of RfA candidates. Why or why not?


 * 5. Question from Retrolord
 * What is your interpretation of WP:Snow?. Do you think it applies here?

General comments

 * Links for NewFranco:
 * Edit summary usage for NewFranco can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose: Please try again when you have much more experience. Technical 13 (talk) 12:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. You have only made 348 edits . Please try again when you have contributed a few thousand edits and have been using your account for a period of months (if not years). Thanks, and happy editing! — sparklism  hey! 12:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Oppose. [User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. Hi Franco. We appreciate your  enthusiasm,  but unfortunately  there is no way that the community  will  be able to  take your  edits as an IP into  consideration. With  only 372 edits and only 201 of those to  article space, there is no  chance that  your RfA will  succeed. Candidate are expected to have made thousands of edits and demostrated measurable skills in  a multitude of areas. You  may  wish  to  withdraw now. For more info, you  might  like to  read this page: WP:Advice for RfA candidates. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose This RfA is downright ridiculous. Shouldn't someone put it out of its misery?, ★ ★ RetroLord★ ★  12:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose Sorry, but administrators are expected to have a great knowledge of policies, not to mention experience. Three months is definitely not enough.--Jetstreamer Talk 13:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)