Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Niteowlneils

User:Niteowlneils
See User talk:Niteowlneils. It's late enough so that all the voters are happy. --Merovingian &#8597; T@Lk 07:45, May 28, 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the nomination, Merovingian. I accept. Realistically it probably won't change my activities much, as I mostly enjoy formatting and editing articles. But it would be nice to be able to revert faster, and leave a more standard message (so far I've usually just done a quick copy&paste of the date/time/user stamp of the version I'm reverting to), when doing RC patrol. I'd probably only help with the most blatant speedy delete candidates, and leave the more borderline cases to the more experienced admins. Niteowlneils 01:21, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
 * I did think of one other admin-ish thing I'd probably do on occasion--swap articles with redirs when the redir has the more common spelling or capitalization, such as prime meridian and Prime Meridian. Niteowlneils 23:47, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
 * It doesn't really effect how I'd act as an admin, but, just for the record, I have added a first draft trying to explain what I feel should be included, at User:Niteowlneils/WIWO Niteowlneils 08:41, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support:


 * 1) Merovingian &#8597; T@Lk 07:45, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Kingturtle 07:52, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Good work on VfD. Meelar 14:05, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Turtles move very deliberately, I am told, so if Kingturtle approves, he must be here long enough. Besides, he has some gray hair, which indicates wisdom. -- Cecropia | Talk 14:19, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Tuf-Kat 14:25, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Chris 73 | Talk 15:08, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) BCorr | &#1041;&#1088;&#1072;&#1081;&#1077;&#1085; 16:10, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Dori | Talk 16:11, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) jengod 16:25, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Angela. 22:30, 29 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Jfdwolff | t@lk . Deletitionist of the scrupulous sort. 16:36, May 30 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) Guanaco 16:01, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) Maximus Rex 18:13, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Snowspinner 19:30, 30 May 2004 (UTC). I'd like to specifically note that I am not opposed to deletionist admins - I think admins should be a good mix of deletionists and inclusionists.
 * 15) Support. – Jrdioko  (Talk)  19:47, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) I agree with Meelar, Jfdwolff, and Snowspinner. --"D ICK " C HENEY  22:22, 30 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) RickK 02:53, May 31, 2004 (UTC) Strongly support
 * 18) Wile E. Heresiarch 17:27, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) ugen64 17:42, May 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Jiang 23:22, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) Certainly support.  Good work on the tutorial.  Isomorphic 06:00, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 22) Strongly support. Far from being a deletionist, he has saved many articles from VfD by researching / improving. SWAdair | Talk  09:00, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 23) It's a little earlier than I'd like, but I support reservedly. &rarr;Raul654 15:35, Jun 1, 2004 (UTC)
 * 24) +sj + 19:07, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC) "Two thumbs up.  Way up!"
 * 25) Cribcage 20:46, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 26) Danny 02:29, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 27) T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  18:18, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 28) 172 20:27, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 29) --GeneralPatton 20:40, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC) Good contributor
 * 30) older &ne; wiser 21:16, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 31) Thue 22:24, 2 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Comment:

How long has this user been here? &rarr;Raul654 07:50, May 28, 2004 (UTC)
 * 4332 contribs since February 22, 2004. --Merovingian &#8597; T@Lk 07:55, May 28, 2004 (UTC)