Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Nunh-huh

Nunh-huh
Nunh-huh (contribs) has been making solid contributions since early Feb 2004 and has now made >2000 major edits, mainly on European royalty/nobility and medical issues, as well as participating in project-wide discussions, e.g. on the usefulness of navigational elements. JFW | T@lk  09:17, 16 May 2004 (UTC)


 * I thank you for the nomination (though the process feels a bit like an extended past-life review), and accept it gladly.   -- Nunh-huh 19:53, 16 May 2004 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) JFW |  T@lk  09:17, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) And I don't feel that having an informative user page--or any at all--should be a requirement for adminship. Meelar 17:14, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) Definitely -- Cecropia | Talk 17:30, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Looks to produce good work to me. - MykReeve 19:58, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) T&#949;x &#964; ur&#949; 20:07, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Dpbsmith 21:07, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) john 21:08, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) moink 21:33, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Lst27 22:23, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Catherine - talk 23:19, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Angela. 00:39, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * 12) --Beelzebubs 00:42, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 13) jengod 05:49, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * 14) Support. --"D ICK " C HENEY  12:06, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 15) Of course! MvHG 12:33, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 16) Looks good, but i am still curious about a user page -- Chris 73 | Talk 13:04, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 17) Why not?  --Merovingian &#8597; T@Lk 14:44, May 17, 2004 (UTC)
 * 18) Solid contributor. Jwrosenzweig 16:15, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 19) Hephaestos|&#167; 02:09, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 20) Finlay McWalter |  Talk 02:35, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 21) llywrch 03:01, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 22) Jiang 00:39, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 23) SimonP 13:36, May 20, 2004 (UTC), agree completely that no user page is needed to be an admin
 * 24) Decumanus | Talk 04:55, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
 * 25) Oh my yes.  +sj+ 09:55, 2004 May 22 (UTC)

Oppose
 * 1) Appears to be a considerate user. If he keeps on this track, I will support at a future time. But, IMHO, not fully experienced here yet. Kingturtle 23:32, 16 May 2004 (UTC)

Comment


 * His (her?) edits look good, although he is pretty new here. But why doesn't he have an user page? (redirects to the talk page) -- Chris 73 | Talk 09:44, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * There's no policy on that. Nunh-huh prefers to be judged by his/her edits, and that's fine. I've seen admins whose user pages do very little to enhance understanding of "the person behind the username" :-) JFW | T@lk  11:29, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
 * It doesnt speak against him. I just would like to know before I vote. Similar questions have come up at other requests for adminship votes, too. -- Chris 73 | Talk 11:38, 16 May 2004 (UTC)