Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Oberiko

User:Oberiko
A great contributor, has made about 2500 edits, his recent work categorizing World War II is admirable. I feel he needs to be rewarded for all the hard work and dedication.GeneralPatton 23:08, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks Patton, I accept your nomination. Oberiko 10:43, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) GeneralPatton 14:55, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 2) Support. Oberiko has also made good contributions to articles about strategy games and works of science fiction. Acegikmo1 19:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 3) David Gerard 16:31, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 4) Support --"D ICK " C HENEY 18:41, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 5) Neutrality 16:25, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 6) Tuf-Kat 21:40, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * 7) Rhymeless 04:04, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 8) Geoff/Gsl 05:40, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 9) Lst27 03:43, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 10) Uncle Ed 18:03, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * 11) Cecropia | Talk 18:06, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC) Thought I already voted for him...
 * 12) Ilyanep 18:17, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC).

Comments
 * I'm not sure adminship should be considered a "reward". Acegikmo1 19:30, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I strongly agree with the above statement. &rarr;Raul654 18:01, Jun 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * His edits look good. How's his dealing with editing conflict? - David Gerard 19:54, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * I've only dealt with a few admittedly. When a conflict does come up I'll ask the other party to talk it over on the discussion page in question.  So far I haven't had anything go beyond that as an agreement has, so far, always been reached. Oberiko 21:26, 13 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * It doesn't sound like Oberiko's work is in topics that are particularly controversial. ;-) There's certainly nothing wrong with that. Isomorphic 00:22, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)