Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Patchouli


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Patchouli
Final (0/3/0) 09:55, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

– Patchouli loves history. Patchouli 09:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I withdraw this nomination.


 * This nomination is closed, due to tagging for deletion twice. Users RfA has been deleted once already per request to start over. He has also indicated on my talk page here and his here that he withdraws. SynergeticMaggot 09:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A: I want to volunteer to learn to skills.  So I wish to start with anything.--Patchouli 09:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A: Mullahcracy, Islamic Cultural Revolution, Iranian Senate, Wire Wager Act, Massachusetts v. Laird, some SCOTUS cases, and more subsume my contributions.-Patchouli 09:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I had one major lengthy debate over Hassan Nasrallah's picture with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that I had uploaded.  Finally, it was resolved after I consented to the picture's deletion.  All in all, I get along with everyone.--Patchouli 09:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Final tally: (0/3/0)


 * Support


 * Oppose
 * 1) Sorry, no. Weak answers, no self description, this RFA was malformed far too many times. –Chacor 09:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose. Due to inexpereince and weak answer to first question. We just had to revert your many attempts to start your RfA, only to delete it. Will support in the future. Good luck. SynergeticMaggot 09:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose and suggest withdrawl. Adminship is not for the faint of heart or the inexperienced, sorry. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.