Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Persian Poet Gal 2


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Persian poet gal
[ Voice your opinion] (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 20:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

– Persian poet gal is an excellent contributor to Wikipedia, who has been with us since October. Born in California from Iranian ancestry, she has made many excellent contributions and has good knowledge of the policies, she is good with working with other editors and has made several thousand edits, often working on wikipedia round the clock. I have nominated this user as they would make a superb admin to wikipedia, and would do well, helping to fight vandals, and keep order. User:Rasillon 20:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

As I mentioned in the RfA that was submitted shortly before this one, I'm declining for the time being. I've been more of a contributer since October of 2006 and feel this needs at least another month or so.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:


 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

Optional questions from 
 * 4. If you encountered an editor who was also the subject of a biographical article editing their own article, how would you handle this situation as an administrator?
 * A:


 * 5. Can you name at least one circumstance where it would be inappropriate to semi-protect an article?
 * A:


 * 6. What would your thought process be to determine that a business article should be deleted using CSD:G11?
 * A:


 * General comments

Discussion



Support

Oppose

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.