Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Piotrus

Piotrus
final (35/0/0) ending 15:18 25 January 2005 (UTC)

Piotrus is a real asset to Wikipedia. He has created or worked extensively on several featured articles, such as Warsaw Uprising, Max Weber, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, and he has started the History of Poland WikiProject. In his time here at Wikipedia, he has made 3635 edits since he joined Wikipedia on 10 April 2004. He has shown himself time and time again to be level-headed, and a great editor with a passion for writing. He would make an excellent admin, and I hope to see him as one soon!

Páll 20:26, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * I accept. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:48, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Support
 * 1) Taxman 22:50, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC). Piotrus has always made good faith edits. He argues his points but is very good at conceding points his counterparts have made that are valid.  That is the hallmark of a good editor. Contributes a lot of good material and researches, something that should get much more attention, now that Wikipedia has hit the big time. He could stand to use better edit summaries.
 * 2) I have disagreed with him about featured article related matters, but he's always polite, genial, and a good editor to boot. →Raul654 23:08, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * 3) A very good editor, I'm sure he'll make a very good admin. Rje 23:29, Jan 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * 4) Support. Just his paragraph below about the name wars convinces me. alteripse 02:56, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 5) Sure. ugen 64 06:09, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 6) Support. Ambi 09:41, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 7) Piotrus's response in the Polish/German naming war is admirable, especially considering it was his hometown and he could legitimately be expected to have strong feelings on the subject. Anyone who can handle that kind of thing is clearly admin material. Jwrosenzweig 15:59, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 8) What Jwrosenzweig said. Johnleemk | Talk 17:24, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 9) What Johnleemk said. Neutralitytalk 22:13, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * 10) Agree with the above. Lst27 ( t a l k )  23:29, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 11) Reasonable in dispute situation. --MPerel( talk 01:17, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * 12) Strong Support. Páll 04:10, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 13) Agree with Jwrosenzweig - Support -- Chris 73 Talk 05:15, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * 14) Support entirely. Halibutt 07:09, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * 15) Everyking 10:31, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 16) Support. Dbiv 12:24, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 17) Wholehearted support. --JuntungWu 13:12, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 18) Yes. Balcer 22:01, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 19) R yan!  |  Talk  14:51, Jan 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * 20) Jayjg  |  (Talk)  17:07, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 21) David Gerard 21:47, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) It's the sensible approach to the Gdanszkig problem that scored points with me!
 * 22) Strong support. Jwrosenzweig said it well.  Antandrus 05:49, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 23) Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy)  10:05, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 24) Kingturtle 10:07, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 25) Support. A fine gentleman-scholar to cabal! jni 10:40, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 26) BLANKFAZE | (&#1095;&#1090;&#1086;??) 00:57, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 27) Slowking Man 07:11, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * 28) Support Duk 11:04, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 29) Danny 12:02, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 30) Bart133 20:29, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 31) CryptoDerk 05:11, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * 32) Support based on contributions (see also comment). Jordi·✆ 08:34, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 33) Support. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  18:28, Jan 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * 34) Michael Snow 19:50, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 35) Support, seems like a resonable fella'. GeneralPatton 05:25, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments
 * I hesitate to make any remark here for fear of seeming bigoted, but I feel I should. The frequent mentions of Poland make me wonder: has Piotrus been involved at all in the Polish-German name wars that have smoldered on for over a year at articles like Gdansk/Danzig?  If Piotrus's involvement has been non-existent or positive, then he has my commendation and support -- I know it was difficult for any knowledgable editor to avoid trouble there.  Conversely, if his involvement has been negative, then I am hesitant to empower an editor involved in such a long-standing edit war.  I hope no one will take offense at my questions, since I mean well: I simply have not kept track of the troubles in that edit war, and want to be sure of the situation. Jwrosenzweig 01:12, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Fortunately most of this problem has passed me by, as I concern myself little with edits of any cities, and the entire name thing seems rather silly to me. I joined that discussion only once, when the revert war was fought at my hometown - Katowice. After I spotted the devastation wrought by constant reverts (entire pages of history with only rv...*shivers*....) I asked involved parties to stop and eventualy requested the page to be protected (see Talk:Katowice for details).--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 01:49, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Jwrosenzweig 15:59, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Piotrus, were your edits previously attributed to another username? I went digging to get the usual numbers, but things aren't matching up. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) UE News  02:40, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think so. Although I am not sure if I understand you - what numbers don't fit what? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 11:06, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * There is a CSV file with editor statistics, and the values it gives don't agree with your special:contributions page, by many hundreds of edits. I thought that maybe it was because you changed your username or had some edits attributed to you, but I'll chalk it up to a software bug somewhere. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) UE News  03:57, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * I am not voting support because Piotrus is not getting involved in the lame Gdunszkig edit wars: by that reasoning anyone who does not touch articles they may have political views on deserves admin rights. My support vote is because I like Piotrus' contributions, regardless of his apparent nationality and political views. Jordi·✆ 08:34, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate

A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
 * 1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
 * A. Good question. Just a few days ago it didn't even cross my mind that *I* could be nominated for an admin. But given I have lots of free online time lately - I think I can help somewhat. I doubt I'd change my activities much - I spend most of my time writing articles and I think it is something I am fairly good at. Still, with power comes responsibility, as they say. I'd be happy to help any more experienced admin - just point to a thing that needs to be done and I will take care of it. Browsing through Requests for sysop attention and Administrators' noticeboard seems like a good idea as well. From what I read about admin powers, rollback thingy looks mighty useful - some pages I watch (like Second World War) tend to attract vandals in hordes on a daily bais, and being able to revert all of their doings instantly looks nifty. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:01, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A. Well, in addition to what Pall listed above, I'd like to point to my 4th most recent FA - Witold Pilecki. I am doing most of my work on history (15-18th and 20th centuries), and some sociology-economics related things. Note that I only did half (at best) of Warsaw Uprising, there were many people working on that one. Oh, and about History of Poland project - I was a cofounder, not a founder. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:01, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and will deal with it in the future?
 * A. Umm, is this a tricky question? A week or so above I could have honestly said I had no such problems whatsoever - none of the articles I worked had caused any major dispute. Recently though I am involved in a POV dispute at Talk:Polish-Soviet War and I believe my behaviour there is a good example of my actions - I try to solve the problem through talk and negotiation. Feel free to read the relevant discussion and judge my behaviour for yourself. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 21:01, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)