Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Prathamprakash29


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Prathamprakash29
Final (0/7/0); ended 22:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC) per WP:NOTNOW  Wizardman  22:03, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination
– I am Pratham Prakash and i want to become a wikipedia administer so that i can verify different pages and contest speedy deletion.Pratham 16:21, 25 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: In verifying pages and contesting speedy deletion.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: In editing certain pages to make it correct and accurate.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No


 * Additional question from Prathamprakash29
 * Number of question. Question
 * A:

General comments
RfAs for this user: 
 * Links for :
 * Edit summary usage for can be found here.

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.''

Oppose

 * 1) Opppose User has made a total of 100 edits, and has failed to transclude this RFA succesfully. I'm not saying this to be mean but it takes several thousand edits to even be considered for adminship and this is just a case of WP:NOTNOW. Sorry mate.-- SKATER  T a l k 17:04, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose for similar points as SKATER. User has 100 edits, has been here a month. His stated reason for adminship—"and contesting speedy deletion."—seems to stem from the only article he has written. Chris857 (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose Way, way too soon. Liz  Read! Talk! 18:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose per above, WP:SNOW. -- KTC (talk) 18:55, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 5) Oppose with moral support, but this is a textbook case of WP:NOTNOW. Come back in a year or two, and with several thousand constructive edits under your belt.  Fight vandalism.  Write articles.  Find sources for articles that have none.  Vote to delete articles that shouldn't be part of an encyclopedia.  Then come back here, and I'll look forward to voting for you.    78.26   (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 18:57, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 6) Oppose As per WP:NOTNOW.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * 7) Oppose per the above - Way too soon & WP:NOTNOW. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  20:18, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.