Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pro Game Master87


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Pro Game Master87
[ Voice your opinion] Ended 00:57 22 April 2007 (UTC)'''

- I am very interested in being an administrator because when I was at school, I was one of the best studiers and I am very intelligent to contribute tons of information. However I mostly know about science and games so I am mostly interested in always editing that rather than something else. However I'd like to revert vandalism, vanity, personal attacks and sockpuppeteers. I will also contribute nearly everywhere in Wikipedia the information from my knowledge but I will still contribute the most on science and games. Pro Game Master87 08:30, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer a few optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Most of the articles of a project but mostly science and games.


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Science and Games because back when I was a kid, I have played games a lot and studied science a lot and my knowledge can help improve Wikipedia.


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: Nearly all over Wikipedia. There were vandalism going on everywhere and this was a very big disgrace to me. My stress here cannot end until all this vandalism is gone.


 * General comments

Please keep criticism constructive and polite.

Discussion


 * If there is any discussion about what information to put in or anything like that, I would encourage them and let them say their opinion and I say my opinion and no personal attacks.


 * If I disagree with something, I just accept it and disagree with the other's opinion.


 * Never try to be better than the other user in a discussion.

I'm not a registered user, so I can't vote. But this is the user who made this edit and who has listed the full names and dates of birth of minors on his homepage (since deleted by an admin) so I'm guessing this won't be attracting too much support... 86.152.203.212


 * I didn't know that was against the rules so that wouldn't count I think... Pro Game Master87 03:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Eh? Ignorance is no defense, especially if you think you've got what it takes to be an admin. 86.152.203.212 18:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Your comments are even worse. You're the biggest disgrace so get the fuck out. Pro Game Master87 00:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Support


 * I will just use my knowledge and contribute
 * Or maybe if somebody else contributed something useful, improve it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pro Game Master87 (talk • contribs)

Oppose


 * Oppose per this. JuJube 19:19, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Oppose per this initially. Uncivil comments about Virginia Tech shooter on talk page. Plus looking through contributions, there is this and this with profanity in edit summary. Probably fall under personal attacks, even if they are against vandals. Evil Monkey - Hello 06:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * No, the user The Hybrid said that those summaries aren't against the rules neither using rude words. Pro Game Master87 08:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * If he told you that, The Hybrid is wrong. JuJube 19:46, 21 April 2007 (UTC)


 * oppose as per EM - excessive pointless profanity and apparent failure to understand this William M. Connolley 13:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * This what?
 * You're pathetic. Pro Game Master87 00:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)


 * oppose no apparent need for tools based on questions --Random832 00:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral


 * Don't bother or disturb anything if I am neutral.
 * If any personal attack or vandalism is going on I automatically give them a warning or revert it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pro Game Master87 (talk • contribs)

Totals: (0/0/0)


 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.