Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Quatreryukami


 * The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it. 

Quatreryukami
Final (0/4/0); Ended Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:08:37 UTC

- I have constantly edited, removed vandalism, participated in discussion and constantly try to improve articles. I would like to become admin so i can help make wiki better!Quatreryukami 20:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

i accept!Quatreryukami 20:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * Questions for the candidate
 * 1. What sysop chores do you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog and Category:Administrative backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
 * A:

AfD, Blocking, CVU, and Protection
 * 2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any with which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * A:

My anti-vandalism edits, and all edits i made to the various pages i am proud of!
 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A:

No, but I would like to stay very sociable and fair as well as having a NPOV on all things
 * General comments


 * See Quatreryukami's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.



Discussion


 * I'm withdrawing, although edit count should not eliminate a user from the running.Quatreryukami 20:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Support

Oppose
 * 1) Strong Oppose- User only has 95 edits after checking his count, only 6 Wikipedia edits, no Wikipedia talk edits, and your answers to the questions show no knowledge of Wikipedia policies and admin duties.-- SU IT  42 20:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose Sorry, but it's a no. You really don't have any experience yet.  I'd try again when you have closer to 1000 edits and have been around for a while.  Your heart's in the right place, but for now, I'd suggest withdrawing.  Gan  fon  20:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 3) Oddly similar to the RfA below. Anyway, oppose per above and suggestion to withdraw. --Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 20:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * 4) Oppose --Majorly (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Neutral
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.