Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Ro098


 * ''The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

Ro098
Final (0/3/0); Closed by Anthøny  at 21:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC).

- Patrols pages, nominates pages for deletion if page is nonsense, makes useful edits Ro098 (talk) 21:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
 * 1. What admin work do you intend to take part in?
 * A: Patrol Pages, block use who vandalize


 * 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
 * A: Nominating pages for speedy deletion


 * 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: No.

General comments

 * See Ro098's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool. For the edit count, see the talk page.


 * Links for Ro098:

''Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Ro098 before commenting.''

Support

 * 1) This user is great, he is nice and helping. He should become an administrator. He does not allow vandalism.
 * This user's only contribution is this support at RfA.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 21:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) . I have helped users, such as Ur a der.--Ro098 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * 1) Oppose - Sorry, with so few edits it is impossible to get a feel for your comprehension of policy and guideline here on Wikipedia. I suggest withdrawing the nomination, giving yourself 6 months of heavy editing at a multitude of areas. Also, you may want to give WP:ADMINCOACH and WP:ADOPT and WP:ER a shot in the future to come.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 21:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 2) Oppose, reccomend snow closure. xenocidic (talk) 21:19, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
 * 3) Oppose, I strongly suggest you withdraw: 29 edits is nowhere near enough. Also, you should spend more time on the questions in the future. Sorry.  weburiedoursecrets  inthegarden  21:20, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Neutral

 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.